Live data from Hacker News

Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

thequantuminsider.com

231–240 of 279 posts

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#231

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

> A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g

it would seem the Total Perspective Vortex has obvious military applications

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Total%20Pers...

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#232
post #180

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

> This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. Huh? Wouldn't it be enough to send some small thing connected by thin wires or wirelessly to the submarine (lasers, ultrasound, whatever) that could aquire location and communicate it? Given military budgets it could probably even be disposable. Leaving beacons in areas of interest also seems like a good idea. With good encryp…

> Wouldn't it be enough to send some small thing connected by thin wires or wirelessly to the submarine (lasers, ultrasound, whatever) that could aquire location and communicate it?

They do, using either tethered buoys or 'buoyant cable antennas' (the cable is the antenna and is itself buoyant) They can use these without coming to periscope depth, or even slowing down.

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#233
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh come on... "On 8 January 2005 at 02:43 GMT, San Francisco collided with an undersea mountain about 364 nautical miles (675 km) southeast of Guam while operating at flank (maximum) speed at a depth of 525 feet (160 m)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_San_Francisco_(SSN-711)

So, here's an anecdote of a sub that miraculously survived a head on collision. What's your point? From the same article: “The collision was so serious that the vessel was almost lost; accounts detail a desperate struggle for positive buoyancy to surface after the forward ballast tanks were ruptured.” I doubt these are problems any submarine crew wants to deal with, even at slow speeds. Besides, one sharp edge at the…

I can't speak for the poster, but I would guess it's something along the lines of "military subs are pretty tough," and the bit about killing everyone onboard with a slow collision may have been an exaggeration.

They are meant for warfare and surviving torpedo concussions as much as possible, so depending on speed, a slow scrape with terrain might not be fatal.

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#234
post #174
post #24

A friend of mine got PTSD from piloting huge nuclear subs in subsea ravines with a clearing of only one inch on each side of the sub. One wrong move, and the entire crew is gone. He also had to do this in conditions similar to surface storms. Looks like autonomous or automatic systems may be developed for those kinds of manoeuvres now, if it is truly that precise. Seems like a huge leap in navigational systems.

I think your friend may have embellished both the accuracy and the risk (not to say that piloting a sub is completely stress free, obviously).

Also maybe not! I don't know what the phenomenon is called, but large ships going though the canals create their own buffer to some extent. It's pretty cool!

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#235

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

I don't understand how this would work.

Do we somehow already have that super-accurate "map of g"? Wouldn't one already have to exist to be able to use quantum navigation? Moreover, would it not also require integration with a gyro and a lot of history to be able to know, for instance, which place it's at of many in any given ocean where g = 9.8100023?

Does g really vary that much that you can figure out where you are with it with sufficient accuracy to do military stuff?

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suspect that may be what these satellites are doing... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRACE_and_GRACE-FO#:~:text=As%... .

I love when HN commenters get out of water on topics. The GRACE retreivals to reconstruct mass changes for "mascons" that are several hundred kilometers in width\height take a month of static overpasses and incredible mathematics and signal processing. There is absolutely no way that their data could be used to locate a submarines, ever.

Lolll it’s my fave, especially when it’s after a sibling comment that explains “uh no” using ~7th grade science

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#237
post #220

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

Former submariner here with a quibble on this: > one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock While getting a GPS position is helpful, the primary reason a submarine goes to periscope depth regularly is for communications. The Navy needs to send information to submarines and know that they'll get it and take action within a certain timeframe. That's by far the primary driver.

Do military subs have antenna buoys on cables that they can raise up without having to surface?

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#238
post #180

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

> This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. Huh? Wouldn't it be enough to send some small thing connected by thin wires or wirelessly to the submarine (lasers, ultrasound, whatever) that could aquire location and communicate it? Given military budgets it could probably even be disposable. Leaving beacons in areas of interest also seems like a good idea. With good encryp…

They raise beacons which communicate via laser with satellites, thus avoiding giving away position from radio or audio.

They use audio for short-range underwater communication, but this has side effect of giving away position.

US also built giant ELF (extra low frequency) transmitter to send orders to subs which operated till 2004.

Fun fact: subs have all necessary codes to launch nuclear strike on board since there is no way to transmit these code to them if they are submerged.

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#239

This is the most obvious practical application of my PhD topic. A Bose Einstein Condensate is an extremely sensitive detector of gravity- a nuclear submarine could use it to make an ultra-accurate map of the world based on variations in the gravitational constant g. This would remove one of the primary reasons subs need to surface , in order to GPS lock. It’s a naval chart that would not require surfacing. A French p…

I don't understand how this would work. Do we somehow already have that super-accurate "map of g"? Wouldn't one already have to exist to be able to use quantum navigation? Moreover, would it not also require integration with a gyro and a lot of history to be able to know, for instance, which place it's at of many in any given ocean where g = 9.8100023? Does g really vary that much that you can figure out where you ar…

Yes, and yes. We've had the gravity maps for about a decade now, and the tech for recovering the location given such data was mastered in the late 80s, but no way to make accurate enough measurements while at sea until now.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36223373

Re: Royal Navy says quantum navigation test a success

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are there yet any instruments better than LIGO at a lagrangian point outside Earth's atmosphere and the Van Allen radiation belt?

No, there’s nothing yet. I think you‘re thinking about (e)LISA btw.

Here is a link for that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_Interferometer_Space_Ant...

Post reply on HN