Live data from Hacker News

Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

rebble.io

231–240 of 398 posts

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#231

Seeing as several folks have recommended the Amazfit Bip as an alternative, and I’m considering getting one, I’m wondering if anyone who owns one can comment on: 1. How well it plays with iPhone and 2. Do you have any privacy concerns? I don’t know much about Amazfit as a company.

If you're at all concerned about privacy with the Bip, you can use the open source Gadgetbridge app[1] instead of Zepp for collecting metrics/syncing/uploading faces/etc.

https://gadgetbridge.org/

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#232
post #180
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder sometimes how can people reconcile buying a new X every Y and still be concerned about human rights and the environment, etc.

Because it's not an individuals buying decisions harming those things? Those are the result of governments and corporations. I'm not going to buy a new phone today and it sounds like you probably won't either, I'll check back in tomorrow and see how the environment is doing!

[deleted]

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Samsung XCover6 Pro has an easily replaceable battery (and water resistance and physical buttons and dedication to 5 years of patching). In fact, I think it uses the same battery as the XCover from a couple of years ago. I just ordered mine yesterday actually. Kinda excited.

I'd buy one if it wasn't as slow and unperformant as all the reviews say it is. I want a Galaxy S10e in that package.

Yeah, it's a mid-range phone, not a top-end one. But, eh, $600. And frankly, for what I'm doing, a mid-range phone is quite adequate. It has for example, 3x the memory and 2x the processing power of the temporary phone I'm using right now which is functional-but-annoying.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#234
I'd still be using mine if the battery (and its replacement) hadn't worn out. I was pretty hard on the battery, using a watch face that updated a lot.

I plan to reluctantly get a Pixel Watch. It's the first Android Wear watch since the Moto 360 that looks decent. Still way too thick though and still with a garbage outdated SoC (which wouldn't matter if the software was efficient like Pebble, but...)

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#235
I loved the Pebble and went to the first developer conference. They treated devs right.

Then I moved to Microsoft Band, Microsoft Band 2, FitBit Charge, Fitbit Ionic, Fitbit Versa, Fitbit Sense, and now on FitBit Sense 2 (definitely a big leap forward).

I view Pebble as a huge success, even if it wasn't an immediate financial windfall for the team, as they pioneered something critical for humans.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#236
post #214
post #205

I've always wanted a "watch" (bracelet) that doesn't show the time. Essentially a narrow bracelet with no display and a few buttons on it that I can program, and a vibrating function so I can leave my phone on silent. I already have a watch I like to wear. wearchronos.com seemed to hit my use case, but the reviews aren't great.

Same - something like a headless Apple Watch would be ideal. I legit just want HR tracking and connecting to a chest strap HR monitor, and no watch display, other than the current HR.

Sounds like you want a heart rate monitor and not a watch.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#237
post #48
post #33

Wonder how many are still using an iPod nano as a watch. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1104350651/tiktok-lunat...

My iPod nano battery expanded and cracked the whole device open. I almost literally cried, as I loved that little device too much. Getting a replacement is not an option as any iPod nano battery is about 10 years old now. A sign of what will happen to all the Apple Watches out there.

a replacement battery is 15$USD on ifixit...

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#238
post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same - something like a headless Apple Watch would be ideal. I legit just want HR tracking and connecting to a chest strap HR monitor, and no watch display, other than the current HR.

Sounds like you want a heart rate monitor and not a watch.

I had an Epson Pulsense years ago. Looks like the PS-100 is still in sale and fits this description.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#239

I use my Pebble Time Round or Pebble Time Steel daily on IOS using the official Pebble app. Every major IOS release I think this is the time my Pebble app stops working but it is still going strong on IOS16. Safe for another year. :)

How's the battery holding on with your Round? I abandoned mine three years ago because of a combination of poor capacity and an unreliable charger but I miss it constantly.

Good actually. It still has 2 days life time but I tend to charge it daily for 15m to keep it running forever. When I am wearing my Pebble Time Steel, I make sure that it has 50% charge before switching it off. This tends to keep the battery level between 20 and 80% between charges. I think that's the sweet spot.

Re: Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch

#240
post #205

I've always wanted a "watch" (bracelet) that doesn't show the time. Essentially a narrow bracelet with no display and a few buttons on it that I can program, and a vibrating function so I can leave my phone on silent. I already have a watch I like to wear. wearchronos.com seemed to hit my use case, but the reviews aren't great.

The old Jawbone Up fit the bill somewhat, but I don't remember exactly what features it had. I thought it was a great product and hoped to see more like it.
Post reply on HN