Live data from Hacker News

Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

washingtonpost.com

231–240 of 1001 posts

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#231
post #65

I'd be pissed off if I were a TSLA stock owner. Is Twitter paying Tesla to contract out these employees for their work? Otherwise, it's tons of thousands of dollars Tesla is pissing away on behalf of the CEO's side-hustle.

Quoted post unavailable.

Tesla, not Twitter. I misread it the same way.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#232
post #154

If someone completely new to my codebase came along and tried to evaluate my code I'd laugh. You can't jump in and "evaluate" without knowing context and being familiar with the features.

New people regularly join our company and evaluate our code. Why do you think you couldn’t do that without joining?

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#233

I’m still looking for a concise term for “someone who claims to be an expert but immediately reveals beyond any doubt that they have no clue what they’re saying, simply by opening their mouth on the subject.” Having Tesla engineers over to review Twitter code is definitely that. It’s ridiculous.

No post body was provided.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#234

I'm curious as to how existing Twitter employees get compensated after the sale. Do they have to stay for some amount of time to collect payouts on their shares? These actions only make logical sense if the goal is to make life unpleasant for employees, and get a lot of them to quit.

Anyone holding stock just got a massive bump above the market value(3-4x?) after Elon overpaid for it. If an employee already sold all their RSUs, well, they probably got nothing.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#235
You don't just look at the code, you do a "git blame" and see who wrote it and then discuss the code with them. The Twitter engineers are likely being interviewed to see if they should keep their job. Evaluating engineering staff first hand is an important step to evaluating a company's portfolio of products upon taking it over.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#236

I’m still looking for a concise term for “someone who claims to be an expert but immediately reveals beyond any doubt that they have no clue what they’re saying, simply by opening their mouth on the subject.” Having Tesla engineers over to review Twitter code is definitely that. It’s ridiculous.

Ultracrepidarian.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#237
post #125
post #3

> One former Tesla engineer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly describe the matter but was not involved, said Tesla engineers would have trouble capably assessing Twitter’s code. Distributed systems, the large-scale and spread-out network that Twitter is composed of, are not the automaker’s specialty, the person said. > The “idea of Elon being flanked by his Tesla engineers reviewing Twitter code is…

What a weird thing to say. I can evaluate any code. If it’s code I’m unfamiliar with it takes longer, and the result is more variable, but it’s far from impossible. It’s certainly more reliable than the evaluation of the person whose job depends on it being evaluated as correct.

I'd like your opinion on the MGLRU code they just merged in the kernel. It's a self contained piece of code, you can look at it and print it on paper.

Or the folio patchset. People had a variety of reactions to it, whole lot of energy was spent evaluating that code (which in the end also made it in)

The person whose job it was to make the patch and who has interest in it being correct is not necessarily less reliable than a random HN commenter

You would probably think otherwise if it was your code and some other random commenter with no domain knowledge evaluating it, wouldn't you?

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#238
Comments are just full of people who want to bring down Musk for the most trivial things without acknowledging the amount of good he has put forth.

FYI, I don't own a Tesla or own their stock or own any stock in Musk owned companies. I don't even follow his twitter account.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#239
post #65

I'd be pissed off if I were a TSLA stock owner. Is Twitter paying Tesla to contract out these employees for their work? Otherwise, it's tons of thousands of dollars Tesla is pissing away on behalf of the CEO's side-hustle.

Quoted post unavailable.

Can’t tell if you’re serious or not. Allegedly, Tesla engineers were sent to evaluate Twitter code. Why would Tesla investors want employees to work on their CEOs side investment.

Re: Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staff’s code, workers said

#240
post #3

> One former Tesla engineer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly describe the matter but was not involved, said Tesla engineers would have trouble capably assessing Twitter’s code. Distributed systems, the large-scale and spread-out network that Twitter is composed of, are not the automaker’s specialty, the person said. > The “idea of Elon being flanked by his Tesla engineers reviewing Twitter code is…

No post body was provided.
Post reply on HN