Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found this article very enlightening : https://www.csis.org/features/kremlin-playbook-3 From the center of strategic and international studies. It describes how the same ideology (white male christian) worldview is connected to Putin and Trump, and how the West is viewed as decadent through the moral lens of the fundamentalist churches in both the US and the Russian orthodox church.
Conservatism is relative term. It basically means "keep what we have and carefully evaluate new things". Conservatism in the US is not what conservatism in France is. Conservatism in Mexico is not what conservatism in Brazil is. Putin's version of conservatism, as mentioned in the article, is only applicable to Russia and countries with similar culture. Comparing Trump to Putin is like comparing Nixon to Brezhnev.
Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
231–240 of 301 posts
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know enough about the Hunter Biden Laptop story to know what's true and what's not, but your WSJ link is the opinion section. Can you link to a WSJ article not from the opinion section?
It was revealed to likely be real during the publishing of a book by a fairly neutral Politico journalist on Hunter Biden https://nypost.com/2021/09/21/the-hunter-biden-laptop-is-con... https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2021/09/21/dou...
"Now, however, almost no one disputes [the laptop's] authenticity."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/feb/27/hunter-biden...
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a non-american, I can see how some actions of the left seem to be a bit over the top and as things escalated might really got a bit extreme too. But is a push against racism, for gender equality, LGBT rights really wrong? Do you notice, how much people, who stand for those issues, get attacked in the public discussion?
As an outsider "name of grotesque moral rightnessess" thrown from the Christian right made me spit my coffee out.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Conservatism is relative term. It basically means "keep what we have and carefully evaluate new things". Conservatism in the US is not what conservatism in France is. Conservatism in Mexico is not what conservatism in Brazil is. Putin's version of conservatism, as mentioned in the article, is only applicable to Russia and countries with similar culture. Comparing Trump to Putin is like comparing Nixon to Brezhnev.
So when Trump is praising Putin, where does that come from? What does he admire?
Besides that I think that Putin made genuinely smart strategical steps to ensure that nobody will get between him and Ukraine... How it will turn out we yet have to see.
Cornering a leader with nuclear capabilities benefits nobody and can get dangerous, leaving him with nothing to lose. I think Trump wanted to use Russia to counter China.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And if you think nobody in America wants to jail journalists and media CEOs, go look at any forum with a substantial amount of Republicans talking freely. I'm a liberal and would like to point out that fellow liberals say the same about conservatives. We're wasting energy and making enemies fighting a narrative warfare, and it's frankly very stupid. Jail the their protestors, but not our own. Deplatform their voice…
Agreed. If there's anything I've learned over the years, it's that Democrats and Republicans are equally nasty. The only difference is one side is much more powerful because they are supported by virtually every cultural institution that exists.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's okay. We can always play with semantic definitions of what it means to be a journalist -- and lock Julian Assange up without trial.
Assange should be let go, what's happened to him has been awful. But that's the result of the Obama administration's policy and is literally 1 person vs. the eradication of all independent press in an entire nation. We should free Assange and condemn Russia jailing at least 293 journalists right now.
Empty condemnation of Russia while we simultaneously prosecute the publisher of information which helps us decide whether we are behaving in an immoral manner is not merely hypocritical: it's corrosive of the fundamentals of our society.
Right now the Afghans, Iraqis and Syrians that we murdered and the Yemenis that we are helping murder make condemnation of the Russians not just odd, but erodes all possibility of working in a fairer world.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
When a media agency internally decides not to publish something it might be biased, but that's generally not considered censorship. Censoring can be biased, but not all bias is censorship. Russia participates in censorship on a state level with its own state-run media agencies. These things are not equivalent. The Hunter Biden story is widely reported by numerous American media outlets.
> The Hunter Biden story is widely reported by numerous American media outlets. And that story was banned on social media unfairly(this banning was cheered on by Dems and left leaning folks), even though it turned it to be credible later. It was egregious censorship is the main point I am making here. As bad as Putin? No. Was it bad? Yes.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Avowed leftist here: Let's just agree that both the Dems and Repubs ban/seek to stifle opinions they don't agree with. Someone wants to ban Maus, someone else wants to ban Joe Rogan. Both parties want power at the expense of "freedom". Censorship is part of existing as part of a society though. There are people who seek to actively hurt others using words and media, and the whole idea of a state is to (pretend?) to a…
There is an extremely important difference between these two examples. The first was the government forcing school libraries to remove books.
The second is individuals expressing displeasure with the speech of another individual.
While both involve people who want to silence others. The former is a violation of free speech, while the later is an exercise of free speech.
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Hunter Biden story is widely reported by numerous American media outlets. And that story was banned on social media unfairly(this banning was cheered on by Dems and left leaning folks), even though it turned it to be credible later. It was egregious censorship is the main point I am making here. As bad as Putin? No. Was it bad? Yes.
it’s not just “not as bad” it’s categorically a different thing
Re: Russia to punish ‘fake news’ about Ukraine war with 15 years’ jail
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Hunter Biden story is widely reported by numerous American media outlets. And that story was banned on social media unfairly(this banning was cheered on by Dems and left leaning folks), even though it turned it to be credible later. It was egregious censorship is the main point I am making here. As bad as Putin? No. Was it bad? Yes.
it’s not just “not as bad” it’s categorically a different thing