Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just different use cases. Backdoors are more useful for targetted operations or specific data exfiltration, while plugging yourself to back bones is more useful for mass surveillance. I don't even see why it's controversial to hold this opinion. Reading some comments, people seems to feel offended we could think that from the USA. If anything, the USA are, with Russia and China, among the countries anybody in Eu…
> It's just different use cases. That's a hand-wavy redirection that isn't relevant to the issue at hand, which is that: There is no evidence of the US (and, in fact, many other large countries, with exceptions for e.g. Israel) installing backdoors and breaking into computers in order to steal intellectual property. There is ample evidence of China doing exactly that, against a variety of targets (not just the US - t…
Which it is.