Live data from Hacker News

Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

bloomberg.com

231–240 of 634 posts

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#231
post #195
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> one way to drive prices in your city down is to have some even that renders it undesirable (..., defund the police ...) there are so many problems with your post but the assumption that defunding the police is necessarily going to cause prices to collapse is probably the most obviously biased one. the idea that you should view housing as simply a matter of supply and demand and not consider any externalities is an…

All people need shelter but people are not entitled to shelter in any place of their choosing. Your proposed solution will increase rent prices for people who can't afford to buy a house while pushing the housing prices down and making them more affordable to middle class. So essentially you are making house purchasing more affordable to middle class at the expense of the poor and investors.

> people are not entitled to shelter in any place of their choosing

I don't think that's a useful framing, because it's again putting the framing in terms of market dynamics in a vacuum. People don't pick where they're born, they don't pick who their parents are, and they don't pick the socioeconomic status that they're born into or have as children. The majority of people are born somewhere and cannot really afford to leave. For example, 72% of Americans live in or near the city where they were raised (https://www.northamerican.com/infographics/where-they-grew-u...). Most people don't have the agency to pick where they live based on price alone, because other non-market factors become comparatively larger when you have less money. If you can pick where you live based on price and how interesting it sounds, congratulations, that is privileged position. That's not to shame that position or anything, I'm just saying that the problem has to be viewed from the standpoint that most people aren't in that position. People are interdependent with their relatives, their friends, and their neighbors. Moving costs more than simply the price sticker of your new home minus the price sticker of your old home: the social costs are enormous. I think that a basic right of modern societies should be that people should not be priced out of their homes because of the whims of investors. So again, I think the idea that these things should be viewed through the lens of market dynamics alone is inhumane.

> Your proposed solution will increase rent prices for people who can't afford to buy a house while pushing the housing prices down and making them more affordable to middle class.

ok maybe. My point isn't that I have the perfect solution, my point is that there are far more levers to pull than what was being suggested, and that I do not want to live in a society that considers the problem by only looking at markets and pricing.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#232

Homes like stocks are way overvalued. Homes are fueled by the frenzy of ownership at all costs, and stocks keep pumping at absurd levels. Everything is extremely overpriced. Eventually, it will come down to common sense. My friend has put all his savings and stocks to buy a 2b apartment. Myself, on the other hand, did not sell any stock and have invested all my savings. I rent a much bigger place, my rent is way lowe…

Comments like this make it seem like it’s all figured out.

Everyone’s situation is different based on income (sounds like you are high income too - which makes choosing where to deposit cash easier), location, family/living requirements, current net worth, job stability, partner income, etc...

It is very possible too your friend made the better decision. There was a time where stocks and house prices going up was different and the world was not in a 10 year plus aggressive bull market.

Ultimately, you do what’s right for you.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#233
post #209

I'm actually excited for hedge funds and financial institutions nail this process down and houses are both 1) very liquid, and 2) priced "correctly". Moving when you own a house will be as easy as moving when you're renting.

> I'm actually excited for hedge funds and financial institutions nail this process down and houses are both 1) very liquid, and 2) priced "correctly". Moving when you own a house will be as easy as moving when you're renting

Once financial institutions get it nailed down, they’ll be selling to each other in large tranches based on the strategies and target asset mixes of different funds, because the transaction costs are lower than doing piddling individual sales, interacting with the remaining individual owners only to buy inventory into the institutional system, and for individuals all that will be left is renting through management companies employed by the institutions.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#234
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Decades of under-building due to restrictive zoning laws will do that.

While I don't disagree, there have to be multiple forces at play here. Take a town like Boise. They have very lenient zoning / building req's. If it was just zoning, their property market wouldn't be so out of whack. In addition to zoning, speculative investing, low interest rates, housing authorities, rent control, the list goes on and on. IMO, CA prop 13 is just as guilty as restrictive zoning. We'll never get to s…

eh - I think short term housing fluctuations are different from long term underbuilding. My understanding was Boise was due to demand shocks that supply hadn't had a chance to respond to.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#235
post #225

Homes like stocks are way overvalued. Homes are fueled by the frenzy of ownership at all costs, and stocks keep pumping at absurd levels. Everything is extremely overpriced. Eventually, it will come down to common sense. My friend has put all his savings and stocks to buy a 2b apartment. Myself, on the other hand, did not sell any stock and have invested all my savings. I rent a much bigger place, my rent is way lowe…

This happened in some European cities, and now, a mortage or a rent are equally expensive even to high wage people, like engineers and surgeons.

It is a seller market, and it is probably gonna stay that way for some time. The only properties I am considering buy are those located in vacation places. You can still find good deals, and you can easily repay by renting them out for few months a year.

I will only consider buying a property in a major urban city only if I had to live there basically for ever. Otherwise I will keep renting. Prices in major EU cities, like the rest of the world are insane compared to the level of income, even for wealthy engineers.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#236
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My ideal is for real housing prices to remain somewhat steady - ie. I don't like that I have to pay much more than inflation to get a house compared to what my parents pay. It'd be nice to be able to afford a house where I grew up without having to tie a ridiculous amount of my net worth up in this one very pricey illiquid asset, even if I could get the mortgage.

Real estate is local. Your expectations aren’t reasonable unless housing can be built as quickly as demand rises.

So why can't we not block building housing?

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#237

How on earth did a real estate analytics company lose money buying and selling homes in THIS market?

I'd like to point out that this article neither claims nor provides evidence that Zillow has lost money. For one thing, as discussed previously[1], Zillow earns commissions and fees when both buying and selling houses, so they may be making money even when the prices nominally show a loss. For another, even if the majority of the houses were sold at a loss, that statistic by itself tells you nothing about Zillow's ov…

They are losing money hand over fist in Tucson. I have several zillow signs in my neighborhood right now. Priced at ridiculous levels and Zillow paid an even more ridiculousness(fitting word play) price to "acquire" the home. Its laughable.

Boots on the ground here telling you the market in the Southwest is jacked up... again. I bought my house in 2009 as a foreclosure and I see the same signs I saw in 2007 all over again. I can't speak for the rest of the country, but Phoenix and Tucson are going to be real estate nightmares in 2022.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My ideal is for real housing prices to remain somewhat steady - ie. I don't like that I have to pay much more than inflation to get a house compared to what my parents pay. It'd be nice to be able to afford a house where I grew up without having to tie a ridiculous amount of my net worth up in this one very pricey illiquid asset, even if I could get the mortgage.

We have 1) inflation and 2) population growth. Given the limited amount of resources, land, and labor, why on earth would house prices remain steady? You'd need at least one of these factors to be reversed, or demand for standalone housing to go down for cultural or economic reasons, before you see long term downward trends. In general though I agree with the poster above that the affordability "crisis" is really an…

> We have 1) inflation

Sorry, my criteria for discussing economics is that someone knows what the term "real" means in that context.

Most local community colleges offer economic courses for not too much.

> For some reason nobody wants to move to the rust belt where houses are nice and cheap. People don't want houses, they want the BEST houses.

I would just like to live in the same neighborhood that I grew up in.

This pricing out hasn't always been the case and it's not like these "best" houses became considerably better - it's been the last 10-15 years.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#239

Homes like stocks are way overvalued. Homes are fueled by the frenzy of ownership at all costs, and stocks keep pumping at absurd levels. Everything is extremely overpriced. Eventually, it will come down to common sense. My friend has put all his savings and stocks to buy a 2b apartment. Myself, on the other hand, did not sell any stock and have invested all my savings. I rent a much bigger place, my rent is way lowe…

> Eventually, it will come down to common sense

People have been saying this for a long time in Canada, but there is no indication that things will change. People who waited and saved have simply seen that the price increases have far outpaced their saving rate.

When it's in a government's interests to keep prices rising, then they're going to do things that keep those prices rising.

Another outcome could simply be that actual ownership of a house in some areas becomes so expensive as to be the exclusive domain of the wealthy, and everyone else just rents. More middlemen raising the costs, more renting and less ownership per capita, as is the trend of more and more industries these days.

Re: Zillow seeks to sell 7k homes for $2.8B after flipping halt

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does “vote them out” mean in this context?

> What does “vote them out” mean in this context? I suppose it could mean voting in people to write a law that makes it exceedingly unattractive for institutional investors to buy single family homes. You could probably even do such a thing "neutrally" since people really only need one home and if you own more than two you're almost certainly investing in some way. Apply some onerous tax on each unit owned above 100,…

I suppose all the billionaire investors would just retire and not start 70 shell companies to own 100 units each. /s
Post reply on HN