Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

techcrunch.com

231–240 of 343 posts

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#231
post #195

I'd like to point out that I'm a big astrophotography nerd. And these satellites are regularly showing up in my long exposure images. It's really quite a nuisance, and I don't look forward to it getting worse.

Interesting, can you share some photos?

Not OP, but there are plenty of examples out there: https://www.astrobin.com/search/?q=starlink

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Yeah, apparently just paint one rotor blade differently to make it stand out and birds will stay clear [1] The study you're citing was only studied 4 wind turbines, while the evidence does point towards this working, I wouldn't say that the existing evidence is conclusive. Also, the turbines with the darker blades still killed birds, just less bird than the turbines with standard blades.

Wind turbines don't kill enough birds to be more than a drop in the dead-bird bucket. It's a talking point used by people who were looking for reasons to be against wind turbines, but housecats kill four orders of magnitudes- not 4x, 10,000x- more birds each year. The percent of human-caused bird deaths due to wind turbines is smaller than the percent of Americans dying in airplane crashes each year, compared to all…

seems disingenuous to compare the raw numbers of deaths when windmills still aren’t very common but you want to make them far more common.

not saying i disagree with your point overall but not a fan of that stat

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#233

So where is Amazon in relation to all of this? I got pinged by a recruiter from Kuiper the other week and all I can see is that there's no way they're on track to be working in 5 years. They don't even have a stable launch platform. Would Musk sell Bezos the ride?

Would there be potential AWS synergies that make any sense? Besides having the money to basically give it away for free, that could be a big value add if so. idk maybe enabling the blanketing of the earth in ever expanding ring/echo surveillance. or a cdn though uploading huge video files to a satellite hard drive might not make any sense or actually save any MS given the inherent satellite -> earth delay.

Partnerships with clouds are already happening.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/20/microsoft-expands-its-space-...

Unfortunately storage or compute in space likely don't make much sense at least for now. Its more about direct point to point speed of light access. Where the downlink is directly onto of the cloud datacenter.

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#234
post #219
post #207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2193/200...

>The Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area (APWRA) began operations during the 1980s and by 1998 included about 5,400 wind turbines of various models, each rated to generate between 40 kW and 400 kW of electric power, or 580 MW total >Using mortality estimates adjusted for searcher detection and scavenger removal rates, we estimated the annual wind turbine–caused bird fatalities to number [...] 2,710 (80% CI =-6,100 to 11…

And cats kill even more than building apparently. Screw cats, or rather people who let them roam free.

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#235
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By pressuring Tesla. One thing making me nervous with Tesla's China business is that it will become too big for Tesla to let it fail, at which point Tesla (and every other Musk company) will be beholden to the CCP.

Concerns like this are why I think he considered taking it private again. He can personally not give a fuck and decide to pull out of China anytime, but being a public company and “acting in shareholder’s interests” might get in the way of ethics...

highly doubt that since he’s sucking at chinas teet for tesla

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The whole point of this is that it isn't a non-profit, though. I'd love to live in a world where we can snap our fingers and motivate people to build $1/month internet, but that's not even a remote possibility. Starlink's big boon was that someone with money saw a problem and invested a ton of money into fixing it, hoping to turn a profit in the long-term. I'd love for someone to run fiber out to my house, but even g…

Have you tried an LTE or 5G access point? They cover roughly 97% of the U.S. population. And you don't have to pay for Internet and also pay for mobile service.

I have an LTE access point, it's a pretty bad experience. For one, latency is very high. It's so laggy over SSH that it's basically unusable, and you can forget any VOIP apps with how choppy it is. Speeds are serviceable, but it doesn't really matter since I can't buy an LTE access point without a data cap.

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#237
post #157
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How will China enforce the Great Firewall for instance? By filing legal complaints through the ITU (which is a UN agency), probably. I expect some international treaties probably come into play. Basically, China complains to the UN, the UN tells the US they can't provide Internet service in China unless they follow China's rules, and then the FCC tells SpaceX that if they don't comply the FCC will shut them down. O…

That's, easy, just like they do it in Russia - jail time and fines for having Space X antenna.

Enforcement on the ground is one way to do it, but by going through the legal route they may be able to prevent SpaceX or anyone else from even offering a service in China. No need to hunt down rouge dishes in China if the FCC in the United States does not allow SpaceX to violate other country's laws.

It's kind of a weird situation. I mean, it's space, so you'd think you'd be outside of any legal jurisdiction and be able to get away with whatever, but actually satellites and radio communication are heavily regulated and subject to international agreements and treaties.

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#238
The service is awesome.

In Placerville California our service went from Calnet 10mbps down at 28ms latency to Starlink 160mbps down at 24ms latency.

This is a really big deal and will disrupt a lot of these shitty ISPs that have done nothing for years.

Also, still tracking for my 2021 predictions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25601473

Edit: Price is only $99/month with one up front cost for the hardware ($500).

Upload is currently only 15mbps, but should improve.

Elon says we should see 300mbps soon and less than 20ms ping (iirc).

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#239

The service is awesome. In Placerville California our service went from Calnet 10mbps down at 28ms latency to Starlink 160mbps down at 24ms latency. This is a really big deal and will disrupt a lot of these shitty ISPs that have done nothing for years. Also, still tracking for my 2021 predictions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25601473 Edit: Price is only $99/month with one up front cost for the hardware ($500…

At what price? And how sustainable is that as more users come online? What about uploads?

Re: SpaceX delivers 3rd batch of Starlink satellites in two weeks

#240

The service is awesome. In Placerville California our service went from Calnet 10mbps down at 28ms latency to Starlink 160mbps down at 24ms latency. This is a really big deal and will disrupt a lot of these shitty ISPs that have done nothing for years. Also, still tracking for my 2021 predictions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25601473 Edit: Price is only $99/month with one up front cost for the hardware ($500…

> shitty ISPs that have done nothing for years

Oh no they did do a lot. They lobbied for hundreds of billions of dollars from congress to upgrade infrastructure, then gave themselves bonuses and bought back company stock.

Post reply on HN