Live data from Hacker News

Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

axios.com

231–240 of 535 posts

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> dragging in gifs ... resulted in an attachment

I've never had this problem, and I do it all the time. It embeds just fine.

Non-animated GIFs embed just fine, if that's what you mean. I just tried animated again, and sure enough, attachment.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#233
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd just like this trend of sending reaction gifs to end. People keep posting them in Slack all the time, but I find it about as appropriate as that brief time when all my uni teachers decided that it's hip to include rage comic faces into every other slide of every presentation. , yes I know, I'm fun at parties…

Have you ever been in a mostly white office and noticed how many reaction GIFs are of black people? The term to Google here is “digital blackface”. If you bring this to more people’s attention my guess is that reaction GIFs will become less prevalent in your office.

No, the term to Google here would be "misinterpreting inclusive cultural norms as appropriation".

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#234

I feel so bitter right now. A recruiter asked me to join them back in 2016 and they were paying $200k+ for a senior backend role. I turned them down because I was on a visa and wanted a company with financial stability. A gif-search engine startup sounded ludicrous. Well, here we are...

Were you offered any stock/options? How much would that worth now? (If you don't mind sharing..)

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you ever been in a mostly white office and noticed how many reaction GIFs are of black people? The term to Google here is “digital blackface”. If you bring this to more people’s attention my guess is that reaction GIFs will become less prevalent in your office.

It is amazing the lengths people will go to find something to complain about.

We need a Godwin's law for things being described as "-ism".

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#236

https://overcast.fm/+QLdurp-A8 for a good overview of how Facebook treats its acquisitions. Absolutely disgusting. Throw Zuck in prison.

I notice someone went around downvoting all critical FB comments I've posted recently. They legitimately have shills patrolling HN.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the main problem is not movie studios (where fair use is likely to apply as we're talking about a 10-second GIF out of a 1h+ movie) but all the meme creators on Reddit and other social networks. I assume those make up the majority of GIFs out there and as of now they aren't being compensated or even credited properly.

This is an unpopular opinion, but if the meme creator violated copyright when they made the meme, and they want credit for their “derived version” then they need a license.

What would be the infringement? I would say any animated GIF (or whatever) should be defined as fair use across the board, since it's impossible to use it for anything other than criticism or comment. It's not exactly like Beastie Boys vs. Chambers Bros, but it rhymes with it.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#238
For me Giphy is the poster child of Google's infuriating decision to put videos in the image search results. It's almost impossible to find a gif you can properly embed an HTML these days. Sure, you can use search terms to filter out giphy.com but then a hundred other copycat websites only fill the void with more videos masquerading as image files.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#239
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The other interesting thing about this one, is that they dont even attempt to license content do they? They dont have any content costs? Theres been this fake (steal) it till you make it, wild west approach to growth. Youtube, Buzzfeed, Imgur. You just host anybodys content regardless of if the poster is the owner, and once you get to scale, then you handle copyright and creating your own content so you arent as depe…

I don't think fair use was meant to be something where you base your entire business around other people's content.

Business models have been created upon flimsier foundations. Come on, capitalists: you've taught us for decades that if someone can make it work, it's above criticism. Are we now discovering moral constraints on profit?

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#240
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think one difference with "grok" is that, the way it's normally used, there really isn't IMO a perfect English replacement. To me at least, it implies a deeper and broader internalizing of something than saying "I understand it" or "I get it" necessarily implies.

Grokking being beyond understanding something is central to Valentine Michael Smiths understanding of the world, and therefore the plot, in “Stranger in a Strange Land”. Grok is not simply understanding or knowing a thing, it’s knowing that thing so well and all the things related to that thing, and understanding all of your feelings associated with that thing, that it becomes a part of you. At least, that was my int…

Oh, I've read it and it's on my bookshelf. Just something like 3 or 4 decades ago :-) It was never actually a particularly favorite Heinlein for me though so I haven't re-read in a very long time if ever.
Post reply on HN