Earlier quoted context omitted.
Definitely, I guess as a uni student, I'm worried about the majority of non-technical students who are going to have their sessions hacked and have no clue what hit them and cannot setup proxies/tunnels. I'm not saying this isn't the site's fault. They definitely need a wake-up call.
This was already happening on a massive scale before this new app was released... I honestly don't think it will increase the number of attacks by all that much. It's brilliant as a tool for spreading the word though.
Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
231–240 of 356 posts
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#232For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
SSH_Server -> FaceBook == Unencrypted
SSH proxies are not end to end encryption. They only protect part of the path. Not sure why this is being down voted. It's true. The tunnel is only between the client and the SSH server. The HTTP websites that you visit beyond the SSH server see your clear text packets.
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can get SSL certificates for free for one domain, and they work with all browsers (except Opera, IIRC). Also, you can use Perspectives for Firefox, which I think is much better than the current system.
Off topic, but re: Perspectives. It allows your browser to compare notes with other nodes on the Internet ('network notaries') to ensure that everyone is seeing the same cert for a given website. Looks like a great idea, but how do they prevent the man-in-the-middle from impersonating a network notary?
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#234For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
On a similar note, I have this aliased in my shell (.profile) so I don't have to think before getting a proxy up: alias socks="ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8" That way I can just open a shell and type "socks" and be good to go (well and then do the system preferences deal, but I have an AppleScript that does that automatically).
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#235For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
Also, remember that some programs don't respect the system's proxy settings and instead use their own. Firefox is one of those, you can find its proxy settings in "Advanced -> Network -> Settings"
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#236For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#237For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
Are there public SSH servers that are safe?
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
On Mac OS X, it gives an error saying: Run --fix-permissions first. Run with which command? and how?
I found the binary "firesheep-backend" in: ~/Library/Application Support/Firefox/Profiles/ .default/extensions/firesheep@codebutler.com/platform/Darwin_x86-gcc3 I ran both: ./firesheep-backend --fix-permissions and sudo ./firesheep-backend --fix-permissions and it still asks me to run it with "--fix-permissions". I guess it's time to go digging around in the source to try and find out what it wants me to do. EDIT: Af…
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#239For anyone who has SSH access to a server (but not VPN) and is wondering what to do when you need some security in a pinch, here is a quick fix... Open an ssh connection to a server you have access to using something like the following: ssh -ND 8887 -p 22 rufus@12.120.186.8 where 8887 is the port on your laptop that you will tunnel through, -p 22 is the port the ssh server is on (22 is the default but I use a differe…
I'd like to buy such a server at low purchase and maintenance cost. The Pandaboard[1] looks like a good fit, but the instructions to install a Linux distro are a bit scary [2]. I guess I could do it, from my Mac, but I'm a bit afraid to mess things up with the low-level disk utilities. Does someones sells SD cards with a distro pre-installed? Or an equivalent device with an easier setup? If not, there's probably a ma…
Re: Firesheep: Easy HTTP session hijacking from within Firefox
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're saying that the BCC server doesn't have even a self-signed SSL cert installed? Or something else?
I had a SSL certificate for a while, but actually using it throughout the site without showing users Big Scary Error Messages is not quite trivial. The activation energy for digging through several hours of edge cases was lacking... until today. ("Whoops, while you don't know you're doing it, you pull an unnecessary CSS file into the cached CSS for the registration page which references a background image on an absol…