Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not actually insightful. Every product trivially creates a habit amongst its users of "when , use ."
The insightful part for me is that you can get better or novel products in areas where the "when , use " is the dominant habit by optimizing or changing the habit. Some more examples: - Keurig coffee makers fundamentally changed the coffee habit for many people. - Netflix fundamentally changed the "going to the video store" habit. Making coffee and watching movies were already habits for many people, but it was possi…
Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
231–240 of 506 posts
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#232> CS programs have, in the main, not decided that the primary path to becoming a programmer should involve doing material actual programming. Well, that's because CS programs are designed to teach CS, not to be a vocational school for programmers.
Look, the reason that all the students go to university is to make money. Like 90%+ of undergrads go there to make money so whether it "technically" should be a monastery of cloistered academics pondering the universe (based on some high minded notion of what learning "ought" to be for) is besides the point. University costs a shit ton of money and people (the vast majority) pay it so they can have a decent life.
And the fact that universities are, on the whole, teaching skills that do not help their students accomplish this means either A) they are actively misleading their students B) university is a class indicator more than a place to learn (I can spend huge amounts of money so I'm probably not poor and black - which sucks for all sorts of reasons) or C) they don't understand that teaching academic CS, as opposed to programming, is not what industry demands (so they suck at what they're selling).
These are the people who, quite literally, are billing themselves as the "smartest guys in the room". If that's the case they can well stop sucking at their bloody job!
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get where you are coming from. For me, being a long-term employee having gone through a few transitions from smallish to biggish, and when your storage guy you hired doesn't really know networking basics, or the database administrator has no clue about Linux, etc. it tends to slow everyone down. "Scale" often seems to equate with SF hotshots from one of the big names that will come in and airdrop a brand new archit…
IMO that's a problem of hiring the wrong specialists, or BS artists in specialist hats (see the article's point about "the tech industry is not serious about hiring" :) ).
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#234Anyone want to take a crack at expanding this?: > The tech industry is fundamentally unserious about how it recruits, hires, and retains candidates.
On the other hand, the current approaches clearly don't work very well, and everybody knows it, but nobody seems to be interested in seriously thinking about what we need to do differently. (patio11 and tptacek are notable exceptions)
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#235Especially after reading the comments on this thread, I'm really not sure HN is a good venue for discussing tweet streams. I think if Patrick wanted to write something that would spark a discussion on HN, he'd have written a blog post.
I for one had no idea this was not a blog post.
(so folks understand this is a tweetstorm and not a post?)
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been spending a lot of time lately wondering if people who treat colleges and universities as though their job is worker training are confused, or if I'm naive in believing colleges and universities exist to expand human knowledge through research and education. I suspect the answer is that our culture is confused, we want people who are smart and well rounded to also be useful. And the ugly side of it is, we wa…
Higher education is used as a proxy for intelligence by companies who are hiring because they are not allowed to use IQ tests. So I think it kind of makes sense that our society is confused about the purpose of higher education.
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#237> Companies find it incredibly hard to reliably staff positions with hard-working generalists who operate autonomously and have high risk tolerances. This is not the modal employee, including at places which are justifiably proud of the skill/diligence/etc of their employees. This one. Every job I see when I go looking is 40+ hrs a week, likely with plenty of idle time and projects I don't believe in. Part of this is…
I think you framed your anecdotal evidence as supporting the OP's statement, but also that you misunderstood such statement; and you actually present evidence against it. If companies find it hard to reliably staff generalist positions, _and_ you're a generalist as you claim, then you would find it _easy_ to get a job.
It's incredibly hard to get a job. But your versatility will ensure job security for as long as you care once you're in the door, thanks to your ability to get into the critical path of different department's operations.
I'm a competent, high performing generalist who can work autonomously and self-sufficiently with enough confidence in my capabilities to have a high risk tolerance. In my current company I got tossed around from starting under a marketing manager, to getting shifted under the CTO after stepping on IT's toes too often, to getting pushed into a newly formed Operations group, to finally just reporting directly to the owner. While officially I manage a data management and BI team, in practice I'm the guy you escalate random problems and needs to. Creating a BI team was a byproduct of being a generalist and being the first person that needed a consolidated view of everything (and having the ability to execute on that need).
Looking for a new job is a pain. Companies don't explicitly hire for it, politics can come into play if the generalist doesn't know how to dance around the company in a way that doesn't threaten others' fiefdoms, there's no easy way to suss out competence from arrogance during an interview, no manager wants to frontload your salary on their budget when they won't be getting the full benefit of it, and a host of other things.
Generalists are valuable to a company, holistically. They're oil to the machine and fit in between all the specialized cogs to smooth things out and let you run the engine hotter without breaking down. But managers only manage their own cogs, hiring only looks for the cogs they're told to find, and at the end of the day whether there's oil in the machine is Someone Else's Problem. Very few teams exist which have the prerogative and budget to hire for that holistic need, so most companies just go without oil and don't think about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
It also shows that you could do that for several years, following the rules set by someone else, and passing.
Nice double meaning with 'passing' also meaning something like: "able to appear to be what those in power want me to be."
On the other hand, I have known a number of people who used their self-identification as a nonconformist as an excuse for why they couldn't cut it someplace, whether it's school or a job or some interpersonal situation. It's a bad excuse because it gives the person an easy out for not reflecting on how they could have handled the situation better, or avoided getting into the situation in the first place. It also pushes all of the blame on other people, which is comforting but very rarely 100% true. We should all be our own worst critics, lest someone else beats us to it.
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#239The hardest problem in B2C is distribution. The hardest problem in B2B is sales. AppAmaGooBookSoft are AppAmaGooBookSoft primarily because they have mortal locks on distribution. I agree with this, but I think it's interesting. Wasn't the Internet supposed to democratize distribution? All someone has to do is go to your website. And anybody can set up a website. So it seems like the Internet just shifted the goal pos…
> AppAmaGooBookSoft are AppAmaGooBookSoft primarily because they have mortal locks on distribution. Well, first of all, this isn't true. Google and FB aren't so profitable because of a distribution monopoly. They're profitable due to network effects.
Re: Things Many People Find Too Obvious to Have Told You Already
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
The insightful part for me is that you can get better or novel products in areas where the "when , use " is the dominant habit by optimizing or changing the habit. Some more examples: - Keurig coffee makers fundamentally changed the coffee habit for many people. - Netflix fundamentally changed the "going to the video store" habit. Making coffee and watching movies were already habits for many people, but it was possi…
Is there any product that doesn't fit this pattern?
(Good questions, by the way! I don't want to accept business baloney as wisdom.)