Earlier quoted context omitted.
maybe it goes without saying, but you also avoided the infection risks which come with surgery.
Yeah, and the risk of spontaneous anesthesia death (it's rare, but some people simply don't ever wake up). There's always plenty of reasons not to get surgery, and the only reason to get it is if the outcome for the injury is better, which it wasn't in this case! The default should be to not get surgery unless it has a clearly better expected outcome, whereas the orthopedist seemed to default to surgery for any injur…
i'm not a doctor, but that makes sense to me.
i sometimes hear that medicine has entered the "post antibiotic" era. i can't help but wonder: are surgeons about to take a big financial hit because of that?