Live data from Hacker News

The TV antenna is making a comeback

marketplace.org

231–240 of 254 posts

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Makes you wonder what other good tech the group is ignoring.

Ethernet cables. My friends constantly complain about the quality of wireless, and I try to get them to take a step back in technology and try a wired network.

I'm lucky that I own my own house and can put Ethernet wherever I want (barring a few ill placed concrete blocks / walls). My friends who use and complain about wireless are all in rentals.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#232
My digital TV (MPEG2 DVB-T, I'm in Australia) antenna recently broke and I'm replacing it in the next few weeks.

Once it's back up and running I'll be using MumuDVB [1] to stream channels over my network. Even a Raspberry Pi 1 should be able to act as a "receiver" this way.

[1]: http://goughlui.com/2013/11/10/project-building-a-dvb-t-tv-t...

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#233
post #226
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How on earth does this situation come about? Hypereffective advertising by the cable companies?

Related: Replacing incandescent light bulbs with LEDs - nowadays LEDs have about 95-99% of the warmness profile of an incandescent and are relatively cheap (can result in Another related: NiMH slow-discharge batteries (Eneloop) are very good, last as long in a remote control, and have more consistent charge levels than an alkaline. Yet people (even enviro-conscious relatives) keep buying alkalines. Why?

but people still keep buying incandescents

I think this is a change that's crept up on people, whereas broadcast TV was always there. Apparently the US is phasing out availability of incandescent bulbs?

For low-discharge applications like remote controls, the battery lasts years so it hardly matters. High-discharge devices increasingly come with their own lithium rechargeable batteries.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#234
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope, population density is only important outside of cities. Circa 2000 the US had a lot of unused backhaul capacity between cities. So, the real reason why most people in the US don't have cheap high speed internet is simply corruption at the local, state, and federal levels. PS: This is also why for example Florida lags in solar adoption. When you dig a little into politics you find US politicians are horribly cor…

Calling policy differences corruption is silly. The US made a choice to favor competition and low regulation over no competition and high regulation. It was probably a poor decision. But you can't just label it corruption. Plus backhaul capacity has virtually nothing to do with ISP costs. Almost all the costs is last mile network.

What completion? US has far less internet completion due to various local monopolies than the EU. In much of the US it's flat out illegal to try and compete with the incumbent.

But if you want actual corruption: 200 billion was supposed to pay for high speed internet, but woops companies just pocketed the money. http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070810_0026...

But, hey ignorance is bliss. If you want to pretend the US is not ridiculously corrupt then have at it.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ethernet cables. My friends constantly complain about the quality of wireless, and I try to get them to take a step back in technology and try a wired network.

I'm lucky that I own my own house and can put Ethernet wherever I want (barring a few ill placed concrete blocks / walls). My friends who use and complain about wireless are all in rentals.

I've had good luck running cables along the base of walls, or under carpets when absolutely necessary. It's possible to hide the cables while not damaging anything, if one is careful.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#236
I had cable for one year after college (U-Verse had just come to my city and it was actually cheaper to get cable + internet than just internet for the first year), then cancelled. Only reason I have it now is that my roommate is locked into a contract for a few more months (cancellation fee is greater than just playing out the string, and there are some small convenience benefits, particularly for sports). However, we'll be cutting that cord in December for good. I've had a Mohu Leaf, Roku, and a Chromecast for 3 years (OTA, apps, mirroring), and to be honest, the only things missing for me are Pac-12 Network and TNT (which only matters for select NBA games, anyway). Now that SlingTV offers TNT, Pac-12 Network is really the only thing I'm aware of that isn't legally available without cable.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#237

I'm 24 and I have never had cable in my life. Frankly, I'm surprised it's not more common. You get a LOT of TV for free. I grew up watching PBS and Simpsons and etc. I remember at superbowl some of my friends were amazed that I was able to watch the football game without cable. I was floored. They didn't even know that channels came in over the air. I showed them the antenna, where it installs in the TV, how cheap th…

I've had the same experience. In my experience the quality is much better than legitimate online streaming services or even cable. That might be in my head but the quality is seriously good. Nobody believes me when I tell them I get it for free with a $20 antenna. There's over 50 channels in my area (though to be honest only ~40 of them never air anything worth watching).

I've had my Mohu Leaf for 3 years. In general, it's as good or better than cable or streaming. Had one apartment where I had to spend some time figuring out how to mount it to keep it reliable, and it didn't work in every room, but that apartment had infinite problems with anything wireless, from phones to internet.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pretty much all of the MLB stuff (except for playoffs) is cable only. NFL will at least of the either Monday or Thursday game along with your local on Sunday.

Even the playoffs for MLB are cable only. http://m.mlb.com/postseason-schedule OTA FOX only gets one or two playoffs games and the World Series. In previous years it was possible to watch most of the games online via "live alternative video feeds (excluding the broadcast feed)", and now even that is not allowed. Check out all the disclaimers and fine print here http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/subscriptions/index.jsp?&affiliat…

I suspect that some league (NHL perhaps?) will specifically exclude webcasting from its next huge TV contract. Or it will extract a higher price not to be the first to do so. It will be the beginning of the end for regional sports channels, and eventually for ESPN.

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ethernet cables. My friends constantly complain about the quality of wireless, and I try to get them to take a step back in technology and try a wired network.

I'm lucky that I own my own house and can put Ethernet wherever I want (barring a few ill placed concrete blocks / walls). My friends who use and complain about wireless are all in rentals.

Power line ethernet?

Re: The TV antenna is making a comeback

#240
post #226
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How on earth does this situation come about? Hypereffective advertising by the cable companies?

Related: Replacing incandescent light bulbs with LEDs - nowadays LEDs have about 95-99% of the warmness profile of an incandescent and are relatively cheap (can result in Another related: NiMH slow-discharge batteries (Eneloop) are very good, last as long in a remote control, and have more consistent charge levels than an alkaline. Yet people (even enviro-conscious relatives) keep buying alkalines. Why?

I haven't had much experience with LED bulbs, the early ones I saw weren't omnidirectional, cost a bunch, and needed good ventilation for a reasonable lifespan. I earnestly tried CF for awhile. Maybe due to early technology or cheap bulbs I had to replace them way more than incandescent (I suspected inconsistent power affected lifespan). In addition to that, the extra price and bad color temperatures or flickering bothering me made be go back to grabbing incandescent bulbs when I've had to replace lights. I do plan on doing research and switching to LEDs--I've noticed some LEDs have flickering that annoy me I hope I find something I like after some research.

A year or so ago I bought a recharge pack (Microsoft branded) for my 360 controllers. After only a few charges they wouldn't hold a charge anymore so I went back to alkalines. Either it was a poor quality battery, poor charger, or poor charging habits.

Taking time to research and paying more for a quality solution can be too much for most people. Prematurely releasing technology or poor implementations can also turn people off.

Post reply on HN