Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm, I certainly thought he was implying that things used to be better. The fact that "journalistic credibility was hard to come by" was surely a good thing, no? It means readers are applying more stringent standards to what they read. As opposed to now, when (supposed) journalistic credibility is easier to come by, but worth much less. . . .
Quite the contrary, I believe, and I'm sure your original parent comment was making the opposite point of what you think. As far as I remember from grade school, newspapers in the US started doing legitimate work around the time of "muckrakers," early investigative journalists. It seems we've returned to the days of yellow journalism, when sensationalist articles were written just to push up circulation. https://en.w…
News is bad for you
221–230 of 239 posts
Re: News is bad for you
#222What is the motive for a newspaper to tell people not to read news? Reverse psychology?
Re: News is bad for you
#223I'm a fully recovered Digg, Reddit, Huffington Post, & Perez Hilton junkie. I've been clean since 2009. It really is an addiction that takes over your life. It's like a stimulation that you always have to have. I quit cold by banning the offending websites using my linksys router: ● Go to http:192.168.1.1 using your browser, the default name and password is "admin" and "admin" (please change the password to a REALLY…
Re: News is bad for you
#224Re: News is bad for you
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that is the case, then I used a bad example, but I really don't think I did. Off topic, but... I recently bought a days usage from put.io with bitcoin. They got their money instantly, I don't have to worry about a hacker getting my credit card info or using more bitcoins in my wallet than I gave. I didn't have to enter a bunch of personal information to prove my identity.
When a hacker gets your credit card info, you're liable for $50 and have the hassle of a few days without your card until you get new one. When a hacker gets your bitcoin wallet, they can empty out your entire account.
When the government wishes to make your life miserable and you have a bitcoin wallet, they have to do a lot more work if they want those funds.
Re: News is bad for you
#226Re: News is bad for you
#227Re: News is bad for you
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
When a hacker gets your credit card info, you're liable for $50 and have the hassle of a few days without your card until you get new one. When a hacker gets your bitcoin wallet, they can empty out your entire account.
When the government wishes to make your life miserable and you have a credit card, they can call your credit card company and get your account frozen for reasons. When the government wishes to make your life miserable and you have a bitcoin wallet, they have to do a lot more work if they want those funds.
Re: News is bad for you
#229Re: News is bad for you
#230I'm a fully recovered Digg, Reddit, Huffington Post, & Perez Hilton junkie. I've been clean since 2009. It really is an addiction that takes over your life. It's like a stimulation that you always have to have. I quit cold by banning the offending websites using my linksys router: ● Go to http:192.168.1.1 using your browser, the default name and password is "admin" and "admin" (please change the password to a REALLY…
I bet you're fun to hang out with. :) Can you give me instructions for Netgear too?