Live data from Hacker News

Pushed to the limit as a banking intern

bbc.co.uk

221–225 of 225 posts

Re: Pushed to the limit as a banking intern

#221
Although his death was a sad fact, the truth is it was his choice. In a free world, every adult is responsible for his/her actions. If he did not feel nice working such long hours, he should have quit.

The real issue is if he was paid for overtime and what was his contract details about overtime. Nowadays, a lot of employees demand overtime from their workers without properly compensating them.

Re: Pushed to the limit as a banking intern

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The bank referenced in the article is Bank Of America Merrill Lynch.

Yes, and they are still on IE7, poor souls. Doesn't sound like a place I'd work for... nope.

We got upgraded to IE8 from IE6 last year! :rollseyes:

Re: Pushed to the limit as a banking intern

#224
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had several friends intern as investment bankers and management consultants in the past couple years. The going rate in NYC is about $60k-80k prorated, I believe -- more than enough for a room in Manhattan (which is where they all lived). Even if that weren't the case, most in that career track come from relatively well-off families anyway. I still agree it's an insanely unhealthy and stressful lifestyle, which…

More than enough for where in Manhattan is the real question. $60K a year isn't a great deal of money in NYC. It's very livable - but not if your criteria is "within 20 min of FiDi". You can probably get a decent room on the Upper West Side or Upper East Side, but then you're nowhere close to being within 20 min from work, especially in the middle of the night.

My close friends all lived in downtown or midtown on those salaries, including right in FiDi.

Re: Pushed to the limit as a banking intern

#225
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in both cases true freedom is constrained by a background set of rules enforced by the state No Lord God Mises necessary. The rules for "pure" capitalism are the minimum set needed to allow free exchange between individuals.

Only if you've redefined "capitalism" to mean "any economic system including individual/institutional holdings and trade", in which case you've successfully and retroactively redefined all economies ever as having been capitalistic. A net that catches every fish names none.

I think you missed the "free" part of the definition. The trade between the North Korean death camp guard and a prisoner is between individuals but that doesn't make it capitalistic (because of that "free" part being absent).
Post reply on HN