Live data from Hacker News

Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

blog.katylevinson.com

221–227 of 227 posts

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#221

I feel like there was a time when gender politics wasn't so abrasive in computing. It wasn't healthy, but it didn't make you constantly feel mired in some swamp of unsolvable problems. I preferred the swamp of (un)solvable problems that is computing.

(Katy here) I would super appreciate feedback on how to be less abrasive.

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#222
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is it such a problem, though? It is statistically unlikely that a woman is developer, so people react accordingly. Does it really hurt so much to say "no, I'm a developer"?

Yes, it makes the very demographic people are trying to reach out to the most feel very unwelcomed. It also means that many people never challenge their assumptions and the lady doesn't get to correct them.

I don't understand why it supposedly makes them feel unwelcome.

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#223
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They said the same thing about flight attendants.

Yeah, and now look at them - all middle aged hags and gay dudes. At least first class seems to skew toward the younger and hotter (but still competent). ( Especially in Asian and Middle Eastern airlines where they haven't gone all PC yet.)

Because what you really need on an aircraft, is someone to leer at, who has been instructed to smile and be nice even when you're a sexist pig. Those were the days, huh?

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> we have something that I'd call far worse in its subtlety: Using women for exactly the same purpose Let's get this straight: It's not a sin . Objectification is just a particular functional state. There is only a problem when there is a systemic imbalance that either consistently robs a particular group of agency. There is nothing inherently wrong with objectification. When you are being a spokesperson, you are vol…

I'm not sure if you're just adding your two cents, which is cool, or wherever you're trying to suggest that I made or agree with the assertion that objectification is a "sin." I do not, and never suggested as much, I simply stated that it was clearly happening.

You can just assume I'm adding my two cents.

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Monocle & a pocket watch aren't exactly fashion choices. I was hinting at "dress codes" as being more reflective of the 18th-early 19th century thinking and not quite so relevant in the 21st century and the Information Age. I was trying to be succinct.

Those two concepts aren't as separate as you want them to be. At the end of the day you're still suggesting a link between a mode of thinking and a mode of dress - while at the same time objecting to that link being drawn for yourself. You can't make a post complaining about people stereotyping engineers, while stereotyping "business types" in the same sentence.

Congrats, you win!

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, and now look at them - all middle aged hags and gay dudes. At least first class seems to skew toward the younger and hotter (but still competent). ( Especially in Asian and Middle Eastern airlines where they haven't gone all PC yet.)

Because what you really need on an aircraft, is someone to leer at, who has been instructed to smile and be nice even when you're a sexist pig. Those were the days, huh?

Not making it right or wrong.

But mens' nature being what it is, we can expect that most (straight) men would rather have a flight attendant who's more

female / younger / attractive

and less

male / older / unattractive.

Re: Booth Babes, Street Clothes, and GDC: Thanks But You sort of Made It Worse

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That Bob Martin post sounds interesting but I can't find it. Do you happen to have a link?

I assume it was this one: http://blog.8thlight.com/uncle-bob/2013/03/22/There-are-ladi...

Ooh, thanks!
Post reply on HN