Live data from Hacker News

Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

gutenberg.org

221–230 of 300 posts

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#221
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a minor bug with chrome in android where the menu will not close when you tap outside the menu or on the menu link/button

I've messaged the guy who's best suited to fixing this. He'll be on it this weekend

Oh no. I did not want to cause someone to work on the weekend. I hope it's his hobby!

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#222
post #2

Hi! I'm one of the programmers at Gutenberg. We've been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!). If you haven't visited the page recently, it's worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/

Great project. Are many of the books in a format that can easily be converted into audio? Is there a way to search for them, and information on what software your readers find useful for this purpose? (Note: A lot of print media these days has switched to far-to-small font-sizes. Less of a problem for (zoomable) digital media, but for many that's still a barrier.)

For the Audio part, I suggest https://desktop.with.audio

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#223
post #2

Hi! I'm one of the programmers at Gutenberg. We've been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!). If you haven't visited the page recently, it's worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/

The biggest lever: make the reading experience great. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/245/pg245-images.html is still hard to read: lines are tooo long (macbook), no great way for pagination/remembering where I was, notes

Firefox's reader mode works amazingly for these situations.

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I have very mixed feelings about Standard Ebooks[…] Why?

Not the GP, but I also have mixed feelings about Standard Ebooks. They modernise texts for American readers. This means changing the punctuation, merging some words, altering the syntax, etc. When I read an old novel, written two centuries ago in England, the little differences to modern English are part of the charm, and I certainly don't want any Americanism mixed in. For one of my favorite novels, The Forsyte saga…

SE editor in chief here. What you describe is incorrect. The only thing we do is very light sound-alike spelling modernization, like "to-night" -> "tonight". We do not do things like change from en-GB to en-US, replace old words with different modern words, or change text for "American readers", whatever that means. I have no idea where you got that impression.

I personally worked on the Forsyte saga. If you think something was done in error, please let us know and we'll be happy to fix it.

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#226
post #2

Hi! I'm one of the programmers at Gutenberg. We've been improving the site a lot over the past few months (and more is coming!). If you haven't visited the page recently, it's worth checking out again: https://www.gutenberg.org/

FWIW I absolutely love how 'no-frills' PG is compared to so much of the bloated, over-engineered, script-riddled web these days. Please don't ever change that!

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#229
post #202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the GP, but I also have mixed feelings about Standard Ebooks. They modernise texts for American readers. This means changing the punctuation, merging some words, altering the syntax, etc. When I read an old novel, written two centuries ago in England, the little differences to modern English are part of the charm, and I certainly don't want any Americanism mixed in. For one of my favorite novels, The Forsyte saga…

SE sounds truly, truly awful. Thanks for making me aware of its existence so I can avoid it.

They're providing beautifully made ebooks for free...

The only thing they are is truly, truly wonderful.

Re: Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

#230
post #136
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh that's interesting: 4.5 seconds for the TCP handshake and an additional 9.2 seconds for the TLS handshake. Is this some kind of captcha, since most bots would disconnect before that, so if you complete it once then it knows you're good? (Until the bots catch on of course, but so long as it works it's relatively unintrusive and not discriminatory against uncommon client software (that is, non-Chrome/ium).) The res…

we are having occasional lows in page speed performance due to LARGE amounts of bot traffic. full disclosure - we've not really been able to resolve this fully/well. Let us know if you have a good idea for how to deal with it

How do you currently host everything? Your main web server should not be responsible for hosting content. All books should be hosted on mirrors, and clicking download should automatically select a mirror to download it from.

Furthermore:

* Make sure that all books are downloadable in bulk as torrents.

* Every day, generate a CSV file of all available books and their metadata. Distribute this so that bots and user clients can run queries locally, instead of using your search engine.

Post reply on HN