Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

221–230 of 322 posts

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#221

Post by 63stack »

cromka wrote: post #124
mikeocool wrote: post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their process is outlined here: https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.m... > Maintainers review auto-closed issues daily and reopen worthwhile ones. Issues that do not meet the quality bar below will not be reopened or receive a reply. Seems like not an unreasonable way to deal with the problem of large numbers of low quality issues being submitted.

Sounds like a perfect way to agitate the community going against the established culture like that.

The established culture on a lot of projects is that you open an issue, and then you have to keep pinging it every week otherwise the stale bot closes it with "this issue is stale, closing, but your contribution is very important to us".

It's crap either way.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#222

Post by Matl »

miroljub wrote: post #210
lhl wrote: post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For those that don't want their data trained on, OpenRouter allows you to have account-wide or per-request routing with either provider.data_collection: "deny" or zdr: true (zero data retention). Also, you can use HuggingFace Inference for DeepSeek V4 or Kimi K2.6, both of which work quite well and route through providers that you can enable/disable (like Together AI, DeepInfra, etc) - you'll have to check their poli…

I wonder why the question about data security and training comes often with DeepSeek, Kimi, Glm and never with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google models. Why is that? IIRC, USA data protection protects data of US citizens only, foreigners data is not protected, and the companies are not even allowed to disclose when they collect those data.

> USA data protection protects data of US citizens only, foreigners data is not protected

HN is an American site. If you look at the US government, it is going to fearmonger about anything China related, because they haven't had a genuine competitor for decades and they're scared and lashing out. Most US news just parrot the government line, sometimes more so than state TV would, and so it reflects here.

I also feel comfortable saying that many Americans don't care one bit what happens to foreigners, be it by action of their government or companies.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#223

Post by girvo »

brianjking wrote: post #88
girvo wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like me: that’s what I do. Either Opus 4.7 or GLM 5.1 for planning, write it out to a markdown file, then farm it out to Qwen 3.6 27B on my DGX Spark-alike using Pi. Works amusingly well all things considered.

How are you interacting with GLM 5.1? Via the Claude Code harness? I really wish they'd release a fully multimodal model already.

Through Pi, mostly! Also my own for-fun agent I wrote

Yeah so would I, I do miss having vision tools sadly.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#225

Post by throwatdem12311 »

yard2010 wrote: post #125
varenc wrote: post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The more interesting part of deepclaude is the local proxy it runs to switch models mid-session and do combined cost tracking. Though these features seem quite buried in the LLM-generated readme. Looking at the history, it appears they were added later, and the readme wasn't restructured to highlight this. Also, the author checked in their apparently effective social media advertising plan: https://github.com/aattara…

How come such slop is allowed here, what value do these vibe coded zero shot "projects" add? Why not just post the prompt?

Seriously. When I first looked this project had been pushed the first commit two hours prior. Projects should be at least 3 months old or automatically removed.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#226

Post by ulimn »

throwatdem12311 wrote: post #225
yard2010 wrote: post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How come such slop is allowed here, what value do these vibe coded zero shot "projects" add? Why not just post the prompt?

Seriously. When I first looked this project had been pushed the first commit two hours prior. Projects should be at least 3 months old or automatically removed.

But then that would have the downside of falsely blocking projects that were developed in private and then just pushed to Github (or any public repo). Like I always use my own, self-hosted Forgejo for everything by default.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#227

Post by amunozo »

girvo wrote: post #59
2ndorderthought wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is glm 5.1? I have t tried it yet but have been meaning too

It's surprisingly good. Beats MiniMax 2.7 and Qwen 3.5 Plus in my testing (I haven't tested 3.6 plus though), quite handily. It's far better than Sonnet, and often equivalent to Opus for the web development and OCaml tasks I'm using it for. It definitely isn't Opus 4.7, but its far good enough to earn it's keep and is substantially cheaper.

Did you compare it with Kimi K2.6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro? I feel they're similar but as GLM is more expensive, I am not using it much.

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#228

Post by jorvi »

lhl wrote: post #205
rapind wrote: post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ANTHROPIC_MODEL=deepseek-v4-pro[1m] ANTHROPIC_SUBAGENT_MODEL=deepseek-v4-flash This is what I’ve been using for non-confidential projects for about a week now (soon after v4 came out). I honestly can’t tell the difference, but I’m not doing anything crazy with it either. Worth noting that I don’t think DeepSeek‘s API lets you opt out of training. Once this is up on other providers though… (OpenRouter is just proxying…

For those that don't want their data trained on, OpenRouter allows you to have account-wide or per-request routing with either provider.data_collection: "deny" or zdr: true (zero data retention). Also, you can use HuggingFace Inference for DeepSeek V4 or Kimi K2.6, both of which work quite well and route through providers that you can enable/disable (like Together AI, DeepInfra, etc) - you'll have to check their poli…

That doesn't work, if you do that it will mark DeepSeek's models with a warning symbol along with the error "paid model training violation".

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#229

Post by [deleted] »

ulimn wrote: post #226
throwatdem12311 wrote: post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seriously. When I first looked this project had been pushed the first commit two hours prior. Projects should be at least 3 months old or automatically removed.

But then that would have the downside of falsely blocking projects that were developed in private and then just pushed to Github (or any public repo). Like I always use my own, self-hosted Forgejo for everything by default.

[deleted]

Re: DeepClaude – Claude Code agent loop with DeepSeek V4 Pro

#230

Post by throwatdem12311 »

ulimn wrote: post #226
throwatdem12311 wrote: post #225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seriously. When I first looked this project had been pushed the first commit two hours prior. Projects should be at least 3 months old or automatically removed.

But then that would have the downside of falsely blocking projects that were developed in private and then just pushed to Github (or any public repo). Like I always use my own, self-hosted Forgejo for everything by default.

If you develop on your own private instance and then mirror to GitHub to release it then there will be 3 months of git history in the logs.
Post reply on HN