Live data from Hacker News

How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

teybannerman.com

221–230 of 406 posts

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#221

Related: a list of all Microsoft login portals (there are 609 of them). https://msportals.io/

Holy shit.

What the hell is Kevin Scott (Microslop's CTO) doing with his time? How can any reasonable leader look at this disaster and go "hmm, yes, this looks like a sane and sustainable setup for future growth"?

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#222

Ignoring the disaster that is their branding/naming. Copilot is _amazing_. Everyone is hyping about Claude, but I'm way more productive with the copilot cli. The copilot cloud agent is great, and copilot code review is great (we also tried the new very expensive claude code review - it was slow and expensive). Forget that it's Microsoft, forget that everything is Copilot and go and give it a shot.

At work, they gave everyone a GitHub Copilot license whether they wanted one or not, which meant it started spewing nonsense on all our PRs. (I had them remove my license again.)

I don't use LLMs, but a coworker who does said that Copilot was one of the worst of the lot.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#223

Someone said - in Linux, everything is a file. In Microsoft, everything is a copilot. Lol.

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux is in fact not the origin of the "everything is a file". More properly, "everything is a file" is a Unix concept and Unix's creators deserve credit for the idea. Though Plan9 carries it out much better: Unix networking isn't file-based, Plan9's is. Sorry, I couldn't resist.

[flagged]

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#224
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Copilot is just Microsoft's term for AI. This comment really helps me put things in perspective. I'm guess now that it's Microsoft's way of naming their LLM-powered products/features, the same way "Azure" is basically their codename for "cloud".

Except they named their local hosted version of TFS/VSTS Azure DevOps Server (where the cloud version is Azure DevOps Services). They just like branding their dev tools for whatever they're pushing at the time. In 2002 they named Visual Studio "Visual Studio .NET".

Not just developer tools, reusing trademarks in general.

At one point the next version of Windows Server 2003 was going to be Windows .NET Server.

Also Windows CE, Outlook Express, Xbox App, Xbox Game Pass for PC, Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio for Mac, Microsoft Office Excel, Microsoft Office Word, etc.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#226
post #194
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Copilot Subsystem for Copilot

Copilot Copilot for Copilot

You could try Copilot Copilot for Windows with Windows Copilot. I know it's still got Copilot in it, but not as much as Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot MS Office for Windows Copilot.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Copilot is just Microsoft's term for AI. This comment really helps me put things in perspective. I'm guess now that it's Microsoft's way of naming their LLM-powered products/features, the same way "Azure" is basically their codename for "cloud".

I’ve absolutely seen adverts on TV in the UK by Microsoft advertising Microsoft Cloud. Azure was not mentioned anywhere…

Maybe that's because they don't want people who've never heard of Azure to just let it blend into the wide spectrum of cloud products whereas Microsoft is something almost everyone would recognize.

Re: How many products does Microsoft have named 'Copilot'?

#230
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is unusually simple. I would expect Google to use 10 more marketing names simultaneously without any logic to the product lines.

Didn't it start as Bard?

Well it depends on what you're talking about. The model names were originally called lambda, followed by palm and then finally gemini. The chatbot product was internally known as meena, launched as Bard, and then transitioned to Gemini once the Gemini model came out.
Post reply on HN