Earlier quoted context omitted.
The guy sent the bank a contract. It was the first contract between them, it wasn't a "new contract" (as opposed to the old one? no such thing), it wasn't a "change" to an existing contract. Why did he need to highlight some terms? How do you mean "change the nature of the agreement", change from what? They didn't have an agreement before this. > because it's no longer a change, it's a new contract that replaces the…
And this is why most programmers should stay away from law... He changed the material terms of the contract so the other parties‘ obligations and rights were substantially different than what they had thought they were in the original version. In the U.S. his actions would have resulted in him being bound by the contract but the other party not being bound. Doubling the price of a contract is a material term. Basical…
Re: Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only
#221Yeah except you're completely misunderstanding their criticism of this entire thing. This has nothing to do with "lack of knowledge" and everything to do with criticising the premises and framing of the law in Western societies.