Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code Remote Control

code.claude.com

221–230 of 336 posts

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#221
post #220

Can anyone recommend a tool that gives a 'mission control' overview of multiple agents, but also combines some basic project management functionality. For example, maybe I have an idea for a feature and I want to spin up a new branch and have agents work on that. But then I get stuck or bored (I'm talking personal usage), so decide to park it. But maybe after a few days I have a shower thought and want to resume it.…

Maybe combine Claude Code + Obsidian, so Claude can use the node structure as a second brain for projects. I was just watching this video (not affiliated):

https://youtu.be/6MBq1paspVU

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#222

One more step closer to a closed source system. I think their objective is to move all your code on their systems so you can only modify the code through their AI so they have a moat and will be difficult to move away. They will “guard” your source code and you’ll never see it. Imagine if tomorrow they make a 10x smarter AI, but they say: you can only use if you upload your source code to us and you can’t see anymore…

Seems like it could be problematic in the future since code can't be fixed by humans so the only source of future code for training is unedited Claudeslop.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#224
This new remote control handoff is neat but still requires you to remember to do the handoff. Oftentimes I’m waiting on an agent and then walk away.

I built Crabigator[1] and it's a wrapper around `claude` and `codex`, so its ready for coding on the go on start and already streaming. Plus, crabigator shows many parallel windows, separated by repo/project/machine, so you can manage multiple agents seamlessly.

[1]: https://drinkcrabigator.com

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you have just one streaming subscription?

I do. I rotate every few months among different services. I don't keep a single service permanently.

I think “streaming is more expensive now than cable before” crowd are people like my wife that have 8-10 of them

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#226
I don't think they target the pros here who already solved this problem with vpn/tmux/ssh but to those whose thrilled serious reaction will be "whoaaa crazy i can command claude code now from my phone while on the toilet or on a date?" It's basically a defense attempt against Openclaw.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#227
post #29

so is harnessing tmux/tailscale new "rsync/FTP is enough" thing nowadays?

except there will be no dropbox moment. There is no startup that stands a chance, Openclaw is free, the foundation model providers basically won this space just by providing subscriptions cheaper than any competitor could ever do.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#228

There's https://happy.engineering/ which already does this with many fewer bugs and supports codex.

I was using this religiously but there’s a bug currently that makes the initialization fail and/or throws an error on the phone client. Absolutely great piece of software otherwise, free, anonymous, encrypted and so on. Really hope the team can fix this soon - I would hate to switch back to tmux tunneling.

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#229

have been using tmux and ssh-on-the-phone doing for forever, what's new?

have you gotten a terminal interface on your phone to be acceptably usable? I haven't - not without a real keyboard attached in any case. too many parts of the UX are designed for a true keyboard.

take a look at opencode, it doesn't even have to be a terminal anymore to command your terminal from whatever device you are using

Re: Claude Code Remote Control

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly my experience, I know they vibe code features and that’s fine but it looks like they don’t do proper testing which is surprising to me because all you need bunch of cheap interns to some decent enough testing

Thats not true. Even for testing things, you need to do thoroughly now because standards are high.

From where I'm viewing, the standards in software have never been lower.
Post reply on HN