Live data from Hacker News

OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

jakequist.com

221–230 of 440 posts

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#221
I think this pov lacks empathy.

What if you don't want to trust your computer with all your email and bank accounts? This is still not a mass market product.

The main problem I see here is that with restricted context AI is not able to do much. In order to see this kind of "magic" you have to give it all the access.

This is neither safe or acceptable for normie customers

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> Imagine if Siri could genuinely file your taxes Imagine if the government would just tell everyone how much they owed and obviated the need for effing literal artificial intelligence to get taxes done! >> respond to emails If we have an AI that can respond properly to emails, then the email doesn't need to be sent in the first place. (Indeed, many do not need to be sent nowadays either!)

Yeah the whole filing taxes thing is an epic XY-problem. Governments can make this as easy as a digital signature, there’s zero need for an agent of any kind. Actually most of the things people use it for is of this kind, instead actually solving the problem (which is out of scope for them to be fair) it’s just adding more things on top that can go wrong.

Seriously. The best solution is not having the problem in the first place. Something something Tao Te Ching.

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would it need more than 1? Couldn't they do this with any Mac with an Apple account?

Mac Minis are perfect for locally running demanding models because they can effectively use ordinary RAM as VRAM.

but people dont use OpenClaw with local models

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#226
post #154
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> File taxes? Sure why not, what could go wrong? "Siri, find me a good tax lawyer." "Your honor, my client's AI agent had no intent to willfully evade anything."

These people live on another planet.

It seems to be a common place of residence lately.

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would it need more than 1? Couldn't they do this with any Mac with an Apple account?

Considering there are 1.5M openclaw agents, created by 17,000 humans, it seems like some people really would use more than 1.

if you are counting reported moltbook accounts there are not, the API was spammed by scripts to create accounts

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#228

> This is exactly what Apple Intelligence should have been... They could have shipped an agentic AI that actually automated your computer instead of summarizing your notifications. Imagine if Siri could genuinely file your taxes, respond to emails, or manage your calendar by actually using your apps, not through some brittle API layer that breaks every update. And this is probably coming, a few years from now. Becaus…

every time i've heard someone's speculations about what apple intelligence could have been, it's a complex conspiracy. its problem is that it sucks and makes them no money, so they didn't ship it.

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#229
post #78

people are buying Mac Minis specifically to run AI agents with computer use. They’re setting up headless machines whose sole job is to automate their workflows. OpenClaw—the open-source framework that lets you run Claude, GPT-4, or whatever model you want to actually control your computer—has become the killer app for Mac hardware That makes little sense. Buying mac mini would imply for the fused v-ram with the gpu c…

they're buying mac minis because it's the cheapest way to get a computer with iMessage access to stuff in a closet and leave on at all times. having access to your iMessage is one of the most interesting things openClaw does.

Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

who's "afraid" of green bubbles? it's like saying a toyota corolla driver is afraid of the ford pinto

It's a real thing, you're either too old and/or not dating young people. Some do care a lot.

IMO it is pretty shallow to pick dating partners based on their mobile OS but yeah it does happen.
Post reply on HN