Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

cnbc.com

221–230 of 424 posts

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#221

The price is 40x their target revenue. That's twice the price to revenue multiplier applied to Anthropic in their most recent funding round, and really really hard to portray as a good deal. I don't think it really helps Nvidia's competitive position. The serious competition to Nvidia is coming from Google's TPU, Amazon's Trainium, AMD's Instinct, and to a much lesser extent Intel's ARC. Grow recent investors got bac…

And Cerebras

[deleted]

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#222
post #201

Biggest surprise for me is that they chose to announce this on Christmas Eve. I’d love to have been in the room when that was decided. The big, exciting news doesn’t typically get announced during a major holiday week.

They want the Trump Jr. and Chamath connections to be forgotten by the time the media and YouTubers get active again after New Year. It's a standard media tactic.

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#223
post #159

Given that Groq is basically the TPU spin out Google should have done years ago it shows what a valuable asset TPUs are in Google. Still this they should spin that out though!

Groq is very different from TPUs. The difference in memory should be a big clue. (Groq using SRAM built into each compute unit, vs TPUs using HBM more similarly to GPUs)

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#224

Are they buying them to try and slow down open source models and protect the massive amounts of money they make from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta ect? It quite obvious that open source models are catching up to closed source models very fast they about 3-4 months behind right now, and yeah they are trained on Nvidia chips, but as the open source models become more usable, and closer to closed source models they will eat i…

Shy of an algo breakthrough, open source isn't going to catch up with SOTA, their main trick for model improvement is distilling the SOTA models. That's why they they have perpetually been "right behind".

[dead]

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#225
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

there’s no path to profitability for the buyers of these chips given the cost and capabilities of the current LLM architectures Didn't Anthropic say inference is already profitable?

Presuming that’s why they raised 3 times this year.

Inference being profitable doesn’t mean that they’re selling enough inference to offset their other costs.

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#226
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's an interesting take, it's plausible Nvidia wants to have an SRAM based product, but I am struggling to see why they would pay $20bn to have one /right now/. Even if DRAM prices make Groq's approach more economical, Nvidia can develop a competitive product before Groq could take any real market share.

Exactly. The only way this makes sense to me is if the board needed this product in <1 cycle. Which makes no sense for a market player like NV who already have the PDK, volume, and literally everything else in the universe. But here it is, so there is clearly a factor I have not considered :)

Would a Groq chiplet be worth $20B? If you bundle it while no one else can, maybe..

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#227

From the comment below: > Groq raised $750 million at a valuation of about $6.9 billion three months ago. Investors in the round included Blackrock and Neuberger Berman, as well as Samsung, Cisco, Altimeter and 1789 Capital, where Donald Trump Jr. is a partner. Makes it very hard not to think of this as a way to give money to the current administration. I know, this sounds conspiracy theory grade, but 20b is too much…

The value of Groq comes from its excellent price-to-performance ratio. Its inferencing speeds are faster than those of H200s, and it has the lowest costs in the industry. When running similar batch jobs across different providers compared to Groq, the processing speed can sometimes be more than 10 times faster. These figures are important for developing practical applications for production use. It's common for me to run workloads in Groq that cost less than $100, while the same workload can approach $1,000 on Bedrock or Gemini. They have tuned a set of OS models that can now deliver a full application. The speeds have allowed me to offload a lot of the functionality from heuristics to straight-up LLMs.

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shy of an algo breakthrough, open source isn't going to catch up with SOTA, their main trick for model improvement is distilling the SOTA models. That's why they they have perpetually been "right behind".

They don't need to catch up. They just need to be good enough and fast as fuck. Vast majority of useful tasks of LLMs has nothing to do with how smart they are. GPT-5 models have been the most useless models out of any model released this year despite being SOTA, and it because it slow as fuck.

> They don't need to catch up. They just need to be good enough

The current SOTA models are impressive but still far from what I’d consider good enough to not be a constant exercise in frustration. When the SOTA models still have a long way to go, the open weights models have an even further gap distance to catch up.

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#229

Are they buying them to try and slow down open source models and protect the massive amounts of money they make from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta ect? It quite obvious that open source models are catching up to closed source models very fast they about 3-4 months behind right now, and yeah they are trained on Nvidia chips, but as the open source models become more usable, and closer to closed source models they will eat i…

Shy of an algo breakthrough, open source isn't going to catch up with SOTA, their main trick for model improvement is distilling the SOTA models. That's why they they have perpetually been "right behind".

Too bad, so sad for the Mister Krabs secret recipe-pilled labs. Shy of something fundamental changing, it will always be possible to make a distillation that is 98% as good as a frontier model for ~1% of the cost of training the SOTA model. Some technology just wants to be free :)

Re: Nvidia to buy assets from Groq for $20B cash

#230
post #61

Related on the business side, and from the last two years: AI Chip Startup Groq Raises $750M at $6.9B Valuation - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45276985 - Sept 2025 (5 comments) Groq Raises $640M to Meet Soaring Demand for Fast AI Inference - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41162875 - Aug 2024 (34 comments) AI chip startup Groq lands $640M to challenge Nvidia - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4116246…

From $6.9b to 20 in a few months, not bad…

Acquisitions generally come in at a significantly higher price.

Even in public markets, acquiring all the shares of a company will require an offer that is a significant step above the current trading price.

Post reply on HN