Live data from Hacker News

What if tariffs?

swatch.com

221–230 of 286 posts

Re: What if tariffs?

#221
post #44

Tangential. It is fun to note how in ads showing watches the time is usually 9 past 10 as shown in the image. This apparently gives the most pleasing balance of the watch dials for the eye, while not covering the time indicators below.

Once you know this, you can never stop seeing it. I learned about it years ago and every time I see a watch ad, I notice the same hand position.

Re: What if tariffs?

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you expand on what you mean exactly? I see these sentences like your littered throughout reddit, vague notions of violence/war?

It was a common argument that ultimately all of the constitutional protections, balance of powers and all that were protected by the Second Amendment - that in the face of losing their liberty, Americans would rise up against an authoritarian government. Within this administration, a lot of people feel that there has been an assault on constitutional protections, but the people who trumpeted the Second Amendment as b…

It was always BS .. the Founders never intended the 2nd Amendment as a means to overthrow the government they created--the Constitution explicitly says that treason can be punished by death. And the people making that argument were always hypocritical about how they would apply it.

Re: What if tariffs?

#223
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One way 100% to get people to see your viewpoint is to insult them. Which side are you talking about?

If you read carefully you'll notice I did both sides.

I noticed that what you wrote was neither true nor fair.

Re: What if tariffs?

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, we could be amazed although you seem to be jumping past another, more controversial yet still equally possible conclusion which is that our elections aren’t as pure as we’d all like to believe. Certainly, I’m not here to spread conspiracy and I agree with you here, the results are the only evidence we have of the current situation. Given that, I think many of us were amazed.

Are you saying that, under the Biden administration, there was voter fraud that threw the election to Trump? If so, given that the Biden administration would have every reason to try to prevent that, I'd like to see your evidence. If you aren't, then what exactly are you saying?

There's no significant evidence of fraud, but the states run elections. Feds just tally the electors. Biden admin wasn't closely involved either way.

Re: What if tariffs?

#225
post #148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Why are you attacking a point he didn't make?" Because I missunderstood. "If you're allowed to lie during your campaign and you're immune from the repercussions, of course you're going to sway voters" But in my world, lying is enough to not vote for them anyway.

Sadly a lie travels the world by the time the truth can put on its pants. If Trump did rig any polls, we're still here a year in just trying to get such a court case off the ground. And that year was more than enough to do decades worth of damage.

I think people could know that Trump lies out of habit. It is kind of obvious? The problem that I see is, that they voted for him anyway.

Re: What if tariffs?

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It obviously affects Swiss companies too, because their products become more expensive to American consumers, which makes it more unlikely they will buy them. No one said Americans are the only ones affected. But it’s Americans that pay the tariffs.

if i charge a 39% tarrif on swiss watches, doesn't that make american watches 39% more competitive? So, people will just buy more american watches in your example, no?

That's way too simplistic. When a tariff raises the price of competition, everyone else raises their prices too. It just increases costs to consumers, and raises government revenues.

Re: What if tariffs?

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This might have been true three months ago, but it isn't any more. Narrow margin business like independently owned coffee shops are already seeing consumables increase in price by up to 3x, which then leads them to have to add "tariff surcharges" that show up on their POS devices.

I think we agree?! I’m arguing that the tariff is being passed on to US prices and not distributed onto the worldwide customer base. A manufacturer that doesn't adjust their price structure is passing the price on because the tariff is applied by the government and not by the company selling the product.

Yeah that tracks.

Re: What if tariffs?

#228
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Their opinion of our politics is generally separate from how they treat me personally, and I do the same for people of other nationalities. That is such a sane thing to do. I was always astonished and sad how often strangers in foreign countries instantly link my origin to the actions of the people in power. As if this is completely under my control and with no doubt I support and approve whatever they do.

[flagged]

Given that the EU after over 3.5 years of full scale invasion still buys Russian oil, should we also treat EU citizens as sponsors of the war?

Re: What if tariffs?

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The default should be to treat people with respect and give benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise, treating people as guilty because of where they were born is always a crappy thing to do.

Which is a very interesting statement considering how the US is treating immigrants these days.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN