Live data from Hacker News

The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

nbcnews.com

221–230 of 354 posts

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here are the magic words in US Health Care: "What is the cash price?" It's usually less than you think and often worth avoiding the insurance company hassle. Then you can just get reimbursed with your FSA or HSA anyway.

…. So you pay many thousands a year for insurance, but it’s easier not to use it? Ummm

Yep. It’s a very lovely system.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#222
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HSAs are only available alongside high deductible plans (HDHP), which aren't necessarily ideal in all situations. FSAs are the only option like that if you don't have an HDHP.

What is the point of having a low deductible when you could put the premium difference in a HSA and use it on either the deductible or something uncovered?

There are some cases where an HSA is unavailable. I've had an employer not offer a high deductible plan. I've had an employer offer a high deductible plan, but the insurer not supply it in my home state.

There are cases where it doesn't make fiscal sense. One employer covered 1x premium/employee(spouses and kids were full rate).

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#223
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FSAs are insane, conceptually. "Guess how much money you're spending in a year on healthcare! But beee caaareful: if you guess too high, YOU LOSE IT" I still used mine while I still had access to one, but it was grumpy-making and was usually almost more trouble than it was worth.

I’ve only used HSAs. Can you reimburse prior year expenses from an FSA? If so, allocate the amount you sent last year, reimburse on Jan 1st.

HSAs are your money regardless once you have it (except management fees). So you can spend it until it is gone. FSAs are a very specific set aside for a single year of billing, you can neither spend it on a bill for say, December the year before, nor use it for medical care in January the year after.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"What is the cash price?" magically puts you back in the land of Classical Capitalism, where the service provider wants to keep you as a customer and knows their internal costs and you as a consumer of the service can evaluate their reputation for quality and cost vs other providers. It's adding 3rd parties like "insurance" (which only works as insurance in very limited catastrophic circumstances) and government plan…

Are you calling it the magical land because it doesn't exist? I doubt your doctors office can commit a cash price for the lab they sent you blood too. And try doing that at a hospital and see where it gets you

> And try doing that at a hospital and see where it gets you

I do believe it gets you gigabytes of text, copy protected PDFs, unsearchable PDFs, and other horseshit due to https://www.cms.gov/priorities/key-initiatives/hospital-pric...

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#225
post #3

If someone invoices me, and I don’t pay the full amount in a timely manner, what do you think will happen? Late fees, reports to credit bureaus, collections agencies hounding me, maybe even lawsuits? If insurance companies underpay, doctors should treat that no differently. Don’t appeal through the insurance company itself. Imagine I go to a store and pay less than the full amount at the register, and then the grocer…

Insurance companies hold tremendous leverage over care providers, up to and including the power to effectively put them out of business on a whim. Care providers don't like picking fights with insurance companies.

It depends on the size of the provider organization. In some areas there has been a lot of provider consolidation driven by the need to gain more negotiating power with commercial payers. So we end up with only a few large integrated delivery systems dominating certain regional markets.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#226
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FSAs are insane, conceptually. "Guess how much money you're spending in a year on healthcare! But beee caaareful: if you guess too high, YOU LOSE IT" I still used mine while I still had access to one, but it was grumpy-making and was usually almost more trouble than it was worth.

I don’t understand why any decision maker in any business in the USA chooses to offer their employees (and hence themselves) health FSAs at all, especially when the much superior in every way Fidelity HSA is available.

I've never seen the point of HSAs, either. The only benefit is the tax difference. There are (usually unknown, unstated upfront) plan fees that eat into that, and coupled with the higher deductibles and worse plan coverage, you're going to pay more out of pocket. It's never been clear to me if (higher OOP + plan fees) And it's a time suck.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#227
post #3

If someone invoices me, and I don’t pay the full amount in a timely manner, what do you think will happen? Late fees, reports to credit bureaus, collections agencies hounding me, maybe even lawsuits? If insurance companies underpay, doctors should treat that no differently. Don’t appeal through the insurance company itself. Imagine I go to a store and pay less than the full amount at the register, and then the grocer…

I was thinking the same thing. Would it be permissible to bring each underpayment to small claims court as a separate case? If enough doctors did this, it would very quickly be a legal DDoS attack, like we've seen happen with mandatory arbitration.

When providers join payer networks they generally waive their right to sue over issues like this.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in NL. I pay 130 euros a month for my health insurance, and a max of 375 yearly on deductibles should I accrue some costs. The only reason I pay 130 is because I earn above a certain number, otherwise it's discounted and even free at a certain level (and I opted into the more expensive tier to also have dental coverage). In my case, my employer even pays for my insurance so in reality I don't even pay anything…

"Healthcare that isn't for profit" doesn't mean just a national health insurance. Just that as a random citizen you are shielded from seeing all the same issues underneath. The pharma companies, test providers, equipment makers and personnel are all making profits. I bet the total amount paid is higher that 130 euros a month. There's profit all through the system, so claims that healthcare should not be for profit ar…

Not to mention EU pharma makes 50-70% [1] of their money from the US, an unregulated market. I'd challenge them to shut down that 800USD/shot revenue stream and still give subsidised insulin locally and remain profitable. Hint: they can't. Their shareholders would shut them down in a week. Good luck manufacturing the next new drug then.

[1] https://www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/nncorp/global/en/inv... https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/GSK-PLC-9590199/f...

Edit: I too agree the US healthcare system is flawed, I'm just saying you cannot compare it against EU's results without considering the above fact.

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#229
post #98
post #3

If someone invoices me, and I don’t pay the full amount in a timely manner, what do you think will happen? Late fees, reports to credit bureaus, collections agencies hounding me, maybe even lawsuits? If insurance companies underpay, doctors should treat that no differently. Don’t appeal through the insurance company itself. Imagine I go to a store and pay less than the full amount at the register, and then the grocer…

It's truly fucked up. Most insurances won't publish their fee schedules. So doctors don't know what they will pay. So what they do is bill insanely high knowing the insurance will come back with "Nah, we only cover $X". They'll collect $X, then write off the remainder. Because the fear is not getting the maximum money possible. If the doctor would bill $100 and the insurance pays up to $200, then the doctor "lost" $1…

Health plans are legally required to publish their rates and they all comply with this now. You can literally just go to any payer web site and download the MRF. There are occasional data errors but overall the numbers are generally accurate.

https://www.cms.gov/priorities/healthplan-price-transparency...

https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide

Re: The fight between doctors and insurance companies over 'downcoding'

#230
post #148

What, if any, alternative framework other than single payer could be put into place instead of our current hellscape? Have health sharing plans been successful? Those require a religious affiliation IIRC. I exclude single payer solely because it’s impossible with our current leadership. I’m surprised there isn’t a Costco like medical group that’s nationwide, has a membership, and works solely to provide care efficien…

Where I live, we have three major hospital chains. Imagine one of them is Kaiser Permanente. My primary care is through Kaiser. When I needed to see a podiatrist to get a toenail removed, they were through Kaiser. When I went to an ER a few years ago for some abdominal pain, it was a Kaiser ER. It is beyond me why my employer is paying an insurance company anything at this point. Kaiser should be selling me an annual…

I don't understand your comment. Kaiser Permanente health plans already work that way. If you go to an out-of-network provider then they can still submit a claim to KP, although prior authorization may be required in some circumstances.
Post reply on HN