Live data from Hacker News

Fight Chat Control

fightchatcontrol.eu

221–230 of 528 posts

Re: Fight Chat Control

#223
post #180

Hello! I made this website. Thank you for sharing. I appreciate all the feedback, and have implemented a few changes. A few points worth accentuating to avoid any misunderstandings. It is correct that the current proposal indeed is at the Council level, introduced as a high-priority item by the Danish Presidency. It is not yet with the Parliament. This is important as both need to be in agreement for any legislation…

Good work. I hope the HN front page didn't cause you too much headache with traffic.

Re: Fight Chat Control

#224
post #38

I was very pissed at this, and when I read this part I couldn't continue, it boiled my blood. > *EU politicians exempt themselves from this surveillance under "professional secrecy" rules. They get privacy. You and your family do not. Demand fairness.

> *EU politicians exempt themselves from this surveillance under "professional secrecy" rules. They get privacy. You and your family do not. Demand fairness.

That is what a scam looks like.

In fact it should be the opposite: Government officials should have even far less privacy since you're paying your taxes to them and you need that transparency on where the money is going.

As corrupt as they already are, this just tells you that EU politicians just want even more corruption.

Re: Fight Chat Control

#225
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They only need to succeed one time . People are generally preoccupied with a lot of other things right now, so maybe this is their lucky shot…

cough Patriot Act cough ...which Republicans swore up and down was temporary and yet, oddly, kept getting renewed wirth no evidence whatsoever it was necessary to stop a planned terrorist attack or that it would have stopped the WTC attacks themselves. I bet 90% of the population or more has no idea that the Patriot Act was dumped and replaced with the nearly identical FREEDOM Act. Which took multiple tries to pass b…

Yeah I have a feeling this thing is gonna be exactly like that. Even if this doesn't pass, they'll just rename and repackage it and try again until everyone gets fatigued enough and doesn't have energy to oppose it anymore

Re: Fight Chat Control

#226
post #98
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While we're talking about corrupt politicians, why is this all happening all at once? America, Great Britain, and the EU are all creating tracking, monitoring, and censorship regulations. All at the same time. We're turning the internet into the 1984 inevitability it was predicted to become. We need a Bill of Rights against this. But the public is too lay to push for this. Bolstering or eroding privacy rights will ne…

They are gearing for WW3 and population control. This is obvious. Get out of EU. Now.

Before they could do that, you will see many countries amending their conscription laws.

Now they just need to find a reason to brainwash the general public to sleepwalk into fighting another war.

Re: Fight Chat Control

#227
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Authoritarians will always try and pull this kind of shit. It's just what they do. The bigger question you should be asking is where's the coordinated pushback? Where are the celebrities and public figures taking a stand against this? Where are the grassroots organizations organizing protests and promoting sousveillance programs against the authoritarians who want to take away our rights and privacy? The reason why t…

Where are the celebrities and public figures taking a stand against this? They're afraid of losing their job or being painted as someone who supports terrorists, pedophiles, or other criminals.

[deleted]

Re: Fight Chat Control

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

France is just very regressive when it comes to the internet, any laws which can make the situation worse is usually voted by all parties (see neighbouring rights or any anti-piracy laws), I don't think there's any real reasoning.

The country is predominantly Catholic. So both prudish views on sexual content, but also wanting to pretend sexual abuse by priests in their religion, and their religion protecting those priests, isn't the problem - nope, it's the interwebs creating child abusers. That is coupled with racist fear of terrorist attacks being committed by the African and middle eastern immigrant populations. Sure are a lot of white elep…

>The country is predominantly Catholic

No. Most of the country professes no religion.

Re: Fight Chat Control

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

France is just very regressive when it comes to the internet, any laws which can make the situation worse is usually voted by all parties (see neighbouring rights or any anti-piracy laws), I don't think there's any real reasoning.

The country is predominantly Catholic. So both prudish views on sexual content, but also wanting to pretend sexual abuse by priests in their religion, and their religion protecting those priests, isn't the problem - nope, it's the interwebs creating child abusers. That is coupled with racist fear of terrorist attacks being committed by the African and middle eastern immigrant populations. Sure are a lot of white elep…

"only about 5% of Catholics in France attend mass regularly, which is roughly 2% of the entire French population"

https://www.europenowjournal.org/2019/10/02/the-catholic-nes...

In other words, your claims say more about you than France.

Post reply on HN