Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We're not talking about fidget spinners. We're talking about Hitler memes instead? I don't understand your feigned outrage. The actual valid commercial use case for generative images hasn't been found yet. (No, making blog spam prettier is not a good use case.)
You're right, nothing has value unless someone figures out how to make money with it. Except OpenAI, apparently, because the fact that people buy ChatGPT to make images doesn't seem to count as a commercial use case.
The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
221–230 of 244 posts
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're right, nothing has value unless someone figures out how to make money with it. Except OpenAI, apparently, because the fact that people buy ChatGPT to make images doesn't seem to count as a commercial use case.
OpenAI is not profitable and we don't know if it ever will be.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#223> I’ve been feeling pretty good about my benchmark! It should stay useful for a long time... provided none of the big AI labs catch on. > And then I saw this in the Google I/O keynote a few weeks ago, in a blink and you’ll miss it moment! There’s a pelican riding a bicycle! They’re on to me. I’m going to have to switch to something else. Yeah this touches on an issue that makes it very difficult to have a discussion…
x8 version: still shit . . x15 version: we are closing, but overall a shit experience :D
this way they won't know what to improve upon. of course they can buy access. ;P
when they finally solve your problem you can reveal what was the benchmark.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#224GIGO in motion :-)
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI is not profitable and we don't know if it ever will be.
Have we shifted the goalposts from "something people will pay for" to "needs to be profitable even with massive R&D" then?
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have we shifted the goalposts from "something people will pay for" to "needs to be profitable even with massive R&D" then?
OpenAI is not "something people will pay for" at the moment though.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure if this is sarcasm or sincere, but I will take it as sincere haha. I came back to work from parental leave and everyone had that same Studio Ghiblized image as their Slack photo, and I had no idea why. It turns out you really can unplug from social media and not miss anything of value: if it’s a big enough deal you will find out from another channel.
Why does everyone keep calling news "social media"? Have I missed a trend? Knowing what my friend Steve is up to is social media, knowing what AI is up to is news.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
OpenAI is not "something people will pay for" at the moment though.
Except lots of people are paying for it. I'll refer you to the other post on the front page for the calculation that OpenAI would have to get just an extra $10/yr from their users to break even.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except lots of people are paying for it. I'll refer you to the other post on the front page for the calculation that OpenAI would have to get just an extra $10/yr from their users to break even.
Your response reminds me of that joke about selling a dollar bill for ninety cents.
Re: The last six months in LLMs, illustrated by pelicans on bicycles
#230> I’ve been feeling pretty good about my benchmark! It should stay useful for a long time... provided none of the big AI labs catch on. > And then I saw this in the Google I/O keynote a few weeks ago, in a blink and you’ll miss it moment! There’s a pelican riding a bicycle! They’re on to me. I’m going to have to switch to something else. Yeah this touches on an issue that makes it very difficult to have a discussion…
Just tried that canard on GPT-4o and it failed: "The word "strawberry" contains 2 letter r’s."
strawberry -> DeepSeek, GeminiPro and ChatGPT4o all correctly said three
strawberrry -> DeepSeek, GeminiPro and ChatGPT4o all correctly said four
stawberrry -> DeepSeek, GeminiPro all correctly said three
ChatGPT4o even in a new Chat, incorrectly said the word "stawberrry" contains 4 letter "r" characters. Even provided this useful breakdown to let me know :-)
Breakdown: stawberrry → s, t, a, w, b, e, r, r, r, y → 4 r's
And then asked if I meant "strawberry" instead and said because that one has 2 r's....