Interested in this! Recently wrote a thesis. Wanted to use markdown, but that had too many limitations. After learning and using LaTeX for a bit I got used to it, but the overall experience of setting it up and its usability leaves a lot of room for improvements. But on the other hand it's established in academic writing. Do hope to see something based on markdown be able to replace LaTeX in the future.
Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
221–230 of 285 posts
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can use typst locally and bypass the commercial bits. It is really easy to create different kinds of documents with it. I have been using it to create slides and handouts, and for that I already find it much easier to use than the alternatives.
Can you make slides and handouts from the same primary document? That'd save me an inordinate amount of time for some church use-cases.
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#223Since 70% of comments under each of these posts are always "why not LaTeX?!", I want to start by reaffirming: yes, I do want a modern Markdown-based typesetting system. There even is a place of several of them. It would be absolutely nice to replace LaTeX, simply because it's old trash with remarkably inconvenient syntax, so, yes, a system with full control over markup is desirable. And if it necessarily increases ve…
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#224- Having a typesetting quality and control like TeX does, including mathematical typesetting, although improvements could be made to that, too. (I think I would also like the syntax more like TeX has)
- You can include PostScript codes within the document which can run during the typesetting process (rather than only during output), therefore allowing it to affect decisions of page breaks, etc, as well as allowing PostScript to draw diagrams and control text rendering. (I had written a PostScript program to load PK fonts, so that would make it possible to use PK fonts from TeX as well.)
- Full support for non-Unicode text (without converting it internally to Unicode). (It is OK if it also supports Unicode as long as the code to support Unicode is avoided when not using it (in the entire document or in a part of it).)
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe look at Quarto? Almost every project I start now begins with `quarto project create`. From there I can pivot the material into HTML, .docx, PDF, .PPTX, Typst, LaTeX, and all of them simultaneously.
Which editor or environment do you use to edit these?
There isn't an 'on-the-fly' rendering component for Quarto per se, but using the preview mode it will re-render a preview watching for file changes. A nice GUI editor for Quarto is definitely something people have been asking for. Closest equivalent would probably be Overleaf or Typst web editors?
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#226Some things I would want to see in a typesetting system: - Having a typesetting quality and control like TeX does, including mathematical typesetting, although improvements could be made to that, too. (I think I would also like the syntax more like TeX has) - You can include PostScript codes within the document which can run during the typesetting process (rather than only during output), therefore allowing it to aff…
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#227Some things I would want to see in a typesetting system: - Having a typesetting quality and control like TeX does, including mathematical typesetting, although improvements could be made to that, too. (I think I would also like the syntax more like TeX has) - You can include PostScript codes within the document which can run during the typesetting process (rather than only during output), therefore allowing it to aff…
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#228Some things I would want to see in a typesetting system: - Having a typesetting quality and control like TeX does, including mathematical typesetting, although improvements could be made to that, too. (I think I would also like the syntax more like TeX has) - You can include PostScript codes within the document which can run during the typesetting process (rather than only during output), therefore allowing it to aff…
do you have some sort of ethical opposition to unicode?
UTF-8, UTF-16, UTF-32, UTF-EBCDIC, etc are encodings of Unicode. EUC-JP is not an encoding of a subset of Unicode; it is an encoding of JIS, which is a different character set. The PC character set is not a subset of Unicode; it is the PC character set. Being able to be mapped to Unicode in some cases does not make it Unicode (nor does it mean that these mappings are necessarily "clean", but even if they are, that still wouldn't make non-Unicode character sets to be (subsets of, or even supersets of) Unicode).
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the standard in most hard science fields. Also common in some humanities, too.
Can I ask which humanities? I'm probably showing my bias here, but I'm (respectfully) surprised that, say, poets would want to work in LaTeX :)
Re: Quarkdown: A modern Markdown-based typesetting system
#230Some things I would want to see in a typesetting system: - Having a typesetting quality and control like TeX does, including mathematical typesetting, although improvements could be made to that, too. (I think I would also like the syntax more like TeX has) - You can include PostScript codes within the document which can run during the typesetting process (rather than only during output), therefore allowing it to aff…
What is "non-Unicode" text exactly?