Live data from Hacker News

Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

harvard.edu

221–230 of 1001 posts

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#221

I guess that Harvard probably does not need the Feds as much as the Feds need Harvard but I'm glad they are standing up to the Fascists. I'm going to have to see what NYU is doing now.

> I'm glad they are standing up to the Fascists

Today I learned that demanding an end to racial discrimination makes you a fascist. I swear this word becomes more meaningless by the day.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#222

I guess that Harvard probably does not need the Feds as much as the Feds need Harvard but I'm glad they are standing up to the Fascists. I'm going to have to see what NYU is doing now.

What does the Federal Gov need Harvard for? Harvard gets 16% of its funding from them - what outweighs that on the aide of the Federal government?

One may expect that the funding is paying for research, such that the government finds the trade to have positive expected value.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#223

I hope everyone is ready for a general strike because that time is coming up at us rapidly.

General strike when >50% of those who voted wanted this? What world are you living in?

Edit: I stand corrected, 49.81%. It doesn't change the point much. Especially when that ~49% includes many "working class"[1] voters. Who's going to participate in this general strike? A bunch of office workers?

[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-return-power-fueled-...

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#224
The aggregate demands of the administration are confusing and contradictory. They seem to be simultaneously asking for:

- an end to diversity initiatives

- a new diversity initiative for diverse points of view

- a new policy of not admitting international students with certain points of view

- ending speech-control policies

- auditing the speech of certain departments and programs

- ending discipline of students who violate policies related to inclusion

- disciplining particular students who violated policies related to inclusion

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Let's have a conversation about leaking tax dollars. How do you feel about our tax dollars directly enriching the sitting president? How do you feel about our tax dollars leaking into a military parade to celebrate the president's birthday? If you don't address those leaks, how can we be expected to take people like you seriously when you defend authoritarian policy as fiscally responsible?

You forgot the cost of his golf excursions. (there are a surprising number of Trump golf trackers LOL) https://didtrumpgolftoday.com/ "Est. cost to taxpayers for golf since returning to office: $32,200,000"

that's 10 cents per american (still crazy!), but not $30, and $30 is only for Harvard much less how much federal funds go to other schools

Obviously I'd rather that 10 cents go to something productive, but on the national stage trump golfing feels like just a distraction from much more important topics

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#228
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The tax revenues from the $1.3T company that arose from their online yearbook? Lawyers? Doctors? Medical research? Thousands of highly educated graduates annually? 161 Nobel prize winners?

Don't confuse the credential factory with the skills and quality of the underlying students. Harvard is little more than a toll booth for students who were already smart and over-achieving. It's not like the teaching is extraordinary.

Harvard does substantially more than teach undergrads.

Re: Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you're fine with them arresting dissenters as long as you disagree with the dissenters? That's fairly antithetical to the ideas expressed in the US constitution.

I'm fine with stopping the flow of federal money to people who hate me in particular and who take a salary to convince others to do so too. Those who defend the conduct of universities need to pause and consider that the public has noticed the radicalization of academia, despises it, and will support state action to reverse it.

Which people do you think "hate you in particular"? Why do they hate you - what have you done to them?
Post reply on HN