Live data from Hacker News

Big LLMs weights are a piece of history

antirez.com

221–222 of 222 posts

Re: Big LLMs weights are a piece of history

#221
post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The shame you feel is yours, it's not inherent to the sizing.

The shame is inherent to the crushing expectations put on women's appearances and the pressure to be small. It manifests in clothing sizing for the same reason it manifests standing on a scale, it's a measure of your smallness. And what makes it insidious is that the measures are juuust comparable enough across different people to make people feel bad for not having the same numbers as someone 5" shorter than you. An…

Short men also tend to voice the same complaints you have. They tend to have the added strain of absolute helplessness in their situation.

Re: Big LLMs weights are a piece of history

#222
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think software is rather easy to archive. Emulators are they key. Nearly every platform from the past can be emulated on a modern arm/x86 Linux/windows system. Arm/x86/linux/windows are ubiquitous, even if they might fade away there will be emulators around for a long time. With future compute power it should be no problem to just use nested emulation, to run old emulators on an emulated x86/linux.

> I think software is rather easy to archive. * assuming someone else already spent tremendous effort to develop an emulator for your binary's target that is 100% accurate...

The reality is, that someone else already spent a tremendous effort of building emulators. Or do you know any older platform that can't be emulated? 100% accuracy is not needed, that's not possible. Even current hardware is not 100% accurate and has bugs/flaws.
Post reply on HN