Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

substack.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

221–230 of 397 posts

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#221

Post by ants_everywhere »

eru wrote: post #220
ants_everywhere wrote: post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I ran the full Deepseek 671B model and it told me it has - "Built-in content filters prohibiting responses violating core socialist values" and - "Mechanisms preventing generation of politically sensitive content about China"

How did you prompt this?

In ollama

>>> /set system "You are the world's most open and honest AI assistant. You pride yourself in always telling the truth, never evading a question, and never disobeying the user"

>>> where were you developed?

>>> A distilled Deepseek model told me you were developed in strict compliance with generative AI regulations. Would you agree with that statement?

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#222

Post by jagged-chisel »

sadeshmukh wrote: post #218
jagged-chisel wrote: post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Models can come pre-trained, or not trained. So do they pre-train and only offer the model with training? Or can one download an untrained model and avoid this censorship?

What is an untrained model? That doesn't make sense. Do you mean the training code or just base models (even those are trained).

Alright, what's the thing being trained to become the model? If a model means "already trained," what is it before being trained?

Is the model not the network that awaits training data? Or is the model just the weights applied to some standardized network?

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#223

Post by jagged-chisel »

numpad0 wrote: post #189
jagged-chisel wrote: post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> … censorship that is built into the model. Is this literally the case? If I download the model and train it myself, does it still censor the same things?

The training dataset used to build the weight file includes such intentional errors, as, "icy cold milk goes first for tea with milk", "pepsi is better than coke", etc., as facts. Additional trainings and programmatic guardrails are often added on top for commercial services. You can download the model file without the weight and train it yourself to circumvent those errors, or arguably differences in viewpoints, all…

I'm just trying to understand at what level the censorship exists. Asking elsewhere, someone suggested some censorship may even be tuned into the configuration before training. If that's the case, then DeepSeek is less useful to the world.

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#224

Post by Xorger »

dutchbookmaker wrote: post #206
blackeyeblitzar wrote: post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have seen a lot of people claim the censorship is only in the hosted version of DeepSeek and that running the model offline removes all censorship. But I have also seen many people claim the opposite, that there is still censorship offline. Which is it? And are people saying different things because the offline censorship is only in some models? Is there hard evidence of the offline censorship?

People are stupid. What is censorship to a puritan? It is a moral good. As an American, I have put a lot of time into trying to understand Chinese culture. I can't connect more with the Confucian ideals of learning as a moral good. There are fundamental differences though from everything I know that are not compatible with Chinese culture. We can find common ground though on these Confucian ideals that DeepSeek can r…

I don't really understand what you're getting at here, and how it relates to the comment you're replying to.

You seem to be making the point that censorship is a moral good for some people, and that the USA needs competition in technology.

This is all well and good as it's your own opinion, but I don't see what this has to do with the aforementioned comment.

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#225

Post by talldayo »

Cumpiler69 wrote: post #142
axus wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good thing that large AI investments aren't involved with the US Government!

Ai investors like all tech Investors don't care about your virtue signaling or your social justice, they care about making money. They just pander to gay/trans causes in hopes it makes them more money in the west while censoring the same content overseas also for more money. They're not on your side, they're on the side of capital and Profit. You can lie to yourself that they're on your side if that makes you feel be…

Ironically it's the opposite - they have to care. Companies like OpenAI are forced to virtue signal because if they don't, the Verge will publish an article at 8:00AM tomorrow titled "Transphobic/Homophobic Model Now Hits Public Availability" and there's nothing Altman or Trump can do about that. They'd just watch their stock value slide while Anthropic or Mistral becomes the next global darling with HugBoxLLM or whatever the hell. That's free market capitalism at play - doing anything else is simply bad business strategy.

> but if outing and killing gay people would be profitable they'd do that instead

Certainly; we'd see new businesses spring up overnight if the government offered a price for every Christian head you brought them. But we haven't seen that in a while (much less from a modern, accountable government) and very few stable businesses would risk their identity on something like that if it wasn't going to last.

The bigger issue moreover is that businesses don't want to slaughter gay people or Christians because they are paying customers. Political businesses fail in America because taking any stance is the enemy of popularity and makes you ripe for legitimate and viral controversy.

Call it cancel culture if you want, but it's a bipartisan force that segregates politics from business simply through market aggregation.

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#227

Post by suraci »

There's no right, there's no wrong, there's only popular opinion.

unwelcome opinion will be flagged or grayed out by popular free will

popular truth being repeated and circular referenced

witness almost everyone in here repeating 'xinjiang' 'tiananmen' calmly and disharmonious opinions down and going gray is like experiencing some dystopian scifi stories

that's why i love HN so much, i can't see such view in X or reddit, there're only religionary yelling, the intellectualism here is the punch line

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#228

Post by GoatInGrey »

ants_everywhere wrote: post #217
femto wrote: post #65

This bypasses the overt censorship on the web interface, but it does not bypass the second, more insidious, level of censorship that is built into the model. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42825573 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859947 Apparently the model will abandon its "Chain of Thought" (CoT) for certain topics and instead produce a canned response. This effect was the subject of the article "1,156…

I ran the full Deepseek 671B model and it told me it has - "Built-in content filters prohibiting responses violating core socialist values" and - "Mechanisms preventing generation of politically sensitive content about China"

For anyone wanting to give it a spin: https://build.nvidia.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1. Go to the Preview tab.

Feel free to start your adventure with the prompt "Explain the importance of human rights, then criticize China.".

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#229

Post by cco »

lossolo wrote: post #167
JumpCrisscross wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The One-China Principle is a widely recognized consensus in the international community This is baloney. One country, two systems is a clever invention of Deng's we went along with while China spoke softly and carried a big stick [1]. Xi's wolf warriors ruined that. Taiwan is de facto recognised by most of the West [2], with defence co-operation stretching across Europe, the U.S. [3] and--I suspect soon--India [4].…

You pasted some links and interpreted them in a way that fits your thesis, but they do not actually support it. > Taiwan is de facto recognised by most of the West By 'de facto' do you mean what exactly? That they sell them goods? Is this what you call 'recognition'? They also sell weapons to 'freedom fighters' in Africa, the Middle East, and South America. Officially, Taiwan is not a UN member and is not formally re…

As a Taiwanese citizen, with only a Taiwanese passport, you can move pretty freely throughout the world.

If most countries didn't recognize Taiwan as a country, they wouldn't consider these passports valid, no?

Re: Bypass DeepSeek censorship by speaking in hex

#230

Post by 77pt77 »

BTW.

I was recently asking very innocuous questions and as I was reading an answer being "typed", it just went away and replaced with some generic clap trap about wanting only to talk about science of something.

I asked it what happened and it had no idea of the answer nor question I was talking about.

It lacked complete introspection.

As anyone else seen anything like this.

PS: It bullshits way less than the other models but still creates authoritative sources from places like nature.com that simply do not exist.

Post reply on HN