[flagged]
Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
221–230 of 1001 posts
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#222> CNBC has requested comment from Amazon. According to the article, Jeff Bezos is presumably afraid that Trump would continue to punish Amazon. If that is the case, this seems like an entirely futile exercise. Not that corporate PR responses are ever particularly illuminating. I read an article regarding information conveyed per syllable. English was near the top. Languages with less information per syllable like Spa…
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#223[flagged]
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#224[flagged]
I really wouldn’t hold my breath for a president that doesn’t fearmonger about immigration in the forseeable future.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thats because of the calculation: - Endorse Harris and Trump wins, Trump will seek revenge on Bezos and Amazon (he tried this in the first term) - Endorse Trump and Harris wins, Harris will not act outside the bounds of a normal government official This is capitulation to the perceived threats of a Trump presidency and is very bad.
[flagged]
He has his own broadcast medium to play with and noone has banned it (apart from brazil, but all he had to do was pay some money)
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is probably the most important topic here. It reveals their bias/partisonship and turns the whole newspaper into an opinion piece
Consider the editorial board to be the equivalent of Fox's Opinion shows. They opinion side if the house is nominally independent from the News-gathering operations. If you're arguing purveyors of news should not carey opinion-pieces l, you may be a few centuries too late.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
A journalist's job is to journal something, nothing more and nothing less. If a purported journalist wants to influence or otherwise lead his audience somewhere, he is many things (commentator, advocate, activist, influencer, etc.) but he is not a journalist.
Declaring your misunderstanding doesn't make it so. "Engineers make implements of war" or so.
What is an engine? Citing Merriam Webster[1]:
>3a: something used to effect a purpose
So yes, an engineer can make implements of war among many other implements. The people who actually wage war are called other things.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#228[flagged]
The idea of "objective journalism" is both ahistorical and unsound and mostly just acts as cover for claiming that certain journalism has subjectivity we're not allowed to call out.
It's far better to know how the editors see the world than to falsely pretend that they don't.
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#229[flagged]
Re: Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris
#230It seems like it would be less polarizing if it was the default state for news and information outlets to not endorse any candidate ever and just remain as neutral as possible.