It's obviously an arms race when it comes to malware, but this could be a significant step forward on the defensive side, forcing malware developers to evolve their TTPs.
Cyber Scarecrow
221–230 of 253 posts
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
Author of cyber scarecrow here. Thank you for your feedback, and you are 100% right. We also dont have a code signing certificate yet either, they are expensive for windows. Smartscreen also triggers when you install it. Id be weary of installing it myself as well, especially considering it runs as admin, to be able to create the fake indicators. I have just added a bit of info about us on the website. I'm not sure w…
I’m sure it’s closed source for the eventual plans to monetize it, but what’s the real difference to something like https://github.com/NavyTitanium/Fake-Sandbox-Artifacts and why can’t you at least name yourselves? Not many software promises to fend off attackers, asks for an email address before download, and creates a bunch of processes using a closed source dll the existence of which can easily be checked. Then ag…
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Pretty sure management (without tech clue) have something to do behaviours like this. Always the same bullshit with you people here. Could never possibly someone built a sub-optimal system -- it HAD to be management fucking with our good intentions!
Lemme guess you're a manager.
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
Concerning code signing: Azure has a somewhat new offering that allows you to sign code for Windows (SmartScreen compatible) without having an EV cert. It is called "Trusted Signing" [1], non-marketing docs [2]. The major gotcha is that currently you need to have a company or similar entity 3 years or older to get public trust. I tried it with a company younger than 3 years and was denied. You might have a company th…
So $10+$5 per month versus $195 per year? That's not a big discount.
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Author of cyber scarecrow here. You are right, its a trust thing. Completly understand if people wouldnt want to install it and thats fine. It's the same for any software really. We just havent built up any confidence or trust like a big established company will have.
But why not make it open source? Why not identify who you are as humans? There are ways to establish trust, you aren’t doing any of them.
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#226I don't understand why the software is built how it's built. Why would you want to implement licensing in the future for a software product that only creates fake processes and registry keys from a list: https://pastebin.com/JVZy4U5i . The limitation to 3 processes and license dialog make me feel uncomfortable using the software. All the processes are 14.1MB in size (and basically the scarecrow_process.dll - https://…
Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#227Re: Cyber Scarecrow
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
Concerning code signing: Azure has a somewhat new offering that allows you to sign code for Windows (SmartScreen compatible) without having an EV cert. It is called "Trusted Signing" [1], non-marketing docs [2]. The major gotcha is that currently you need to have a company or similar entity 3 years or older to get public trust. I tried it with a company younger than 3 years and was denied. You might have a company th…
So $10+$5 per month versus $195 per year? That's not a big discount.