Live data from Hacker News

I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

metro.co.uk

221–230 of 526 posts

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#221
In the Netherlands, when I had a monthly first class ticket for my commute, I'd sometimes take the train home and back to work during the day to get work done. I was able to focus in the train much better than in the office, sometimes.

I've also considered going freelance and doing all work from the train with an unlimited ticket like this, it'd work great I think.

But sleeping there is a bit too much.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#222
post #5

Compared to the UK where a standard-class rail season ticket for me to get to London (including underground), at £8,272 p/y.. but for that, I also have the luxury of either standing in an overcrowded carriage, or if I am super lucky I get to sit in a seat that smells of urine.

After spending a lot of time in Europe, the grass definitely isn't greener. Trains in France are not vastly cheaper than the UK, but the service pattern is awful outside the very main routes. Often huge gaps in service for parts of the day and non-clockface timetabling. Seems to be very poor utilisation of rolling stock, with a lot of the stations having trains sitting for hours doing nothing (which should really be…

The UK is part of Europe, too.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#223
post #144

I wonder how does he actually work as a digital nomad. Internet on DB trains is massively unreliable, there are entire patches of country that are not covered by mobile signal.

> I wonder how does he actually work as a digital nomad.

I suspect the secret here is that a lot of people adopting this type of lifestyle produce really mediocre output and some way or another fit into the gaps at a large company that doesn't conduct aggressive performance reviews.

Everyone is different but I find it hard to believe that high quality code is generated from working consistently in that type of environment. Perhaps lots and lots of boilerplate.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#224
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Public transport in the UK is trapped in a vicious cycle. The system is poor, so people buy cars, which means fewer people use the system, which means less investment, which means the system gets even worse, so more people buy cars. Despite all its ills, driving is, for enough people, a more pleasant experience than tackling strikes, standing on a train for two hours, or being unable to travel at certain times at all…

> or being unable to travel at certain times at all. This is all fine and dandy until enough people decide to travel by car, and eventually there are traffic jams making you virtually unable to travel (by car) at certain times as well.

The times are different though. Plus the time when there tends to be the most traffic is when train fairs can be so ludicrous that it was not unreasonable for a group of 4 to consider chartering a helicopter from Bath to London instead.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#225
post #164

If I was his age a $2.5K on a years interrail ticket for unlimited travel across Europe (admittedly 2nd class and there may seat reservation charges) would be very tempting https://www.eurail.com/en

On October he did began to incorporate the Global Pass (3 months) which got him as far as Istanbul and Ankara and high up north as Kiruna in Sweden, Lapland.[0] Seems a very cautious guy, as he was booking a night train from Budapest to Bucharest, apparently he was warned at the counter by an employee which made him very uneasy. Reminds of the story of that TEDx talk.[1] He is clearly enjoying it so I hope the positi…

> high up north as Kiruna in Sweden

His northenmost point seems to have been Narvik (across the border in Norway). From what I can tell, that’s almost 70km (more than 40 miles) north of Kiruna.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#226
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never understood why trains are so expensive in England: when I lived in Bristol I liked to spend time in Bath, it's just a ~10 minutes ride but it costed 10 pounds each way if I remember correctly... but at least you could bring your bike for free :p

Simple, they're run by European train operators to subsidise their national networks.

Bristol Bath is GWR, which is owned and operated by the British company FirstGroup; they're mostly known for First Bus but they do trains too.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#227
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People overusing their subscriptions are compensated by people underusing them.

People who exercise are overusing their share of air. People with more children are overusing their share of sunlight.

According to you, when does a child earn their own share of sunlight, so their parents are not "overusing" their share?

Is it at a certain age, or is that only for children born latest at $YOUR_BIRTHYEAR?

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My commute into Edinburgh is about 35 mins each way by train and it's £9.60 for a return (reduced for a bit because of a subsidy by the Scottish Government) normal price is about £15.00.

I'm in the US. We wanted a commuter train in my city - instead we got a very expensive toll lane built by a Spanish company. The tolls are so expensive by the mile that only the wealthy or those with a business that can write them off as an expense use the lane. If the company doesn't make enough, our taxes have to pay for the shortfall.

I actually like my commute into Edinburgh - it's very scenic, you go over the Forth Bridge and I always get a seat. There was a while when the trains were less reliable but since the Scottish government took over direct management of the rail company things seem a lot better.

Re: I spend £8,500 a year to live on a train

#230
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He can visit relatives and friends whenever he feels like, no matter how far away they might be. Breakfast in Berlin, Dinner in München. His exit strategy is probably the same as mine, his bedroom at mom and pop’s hotel

It's not just about seeing people. It's about having deep connections and shared experiences. Eg: one of his friends has a life crisis and just needs to talk to someone. Are they going to hop on a train and track this guy down, or will they go see one of their other friends? So he will miss out being the person someone turns to, and these are the defining moments for long lasting friendships. Again, probably fine for…

> Eg: one of his friends has a life crisis and just needs to talk to someone.

He can hop on the train and trivially go to them. He probably sees his friends more than many others who are separated by long distances.

In a world of instant comms, he doesn’t need to be tracked down. He can be summoned and in a few hours, appear.

Post reply on HN