Live data from Hacker News

Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

apple.com

221–230 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#221
On the power consumption vs performance ratios, every chart showed the M3 cranking at higher overall power usage than the M1 when under load.

One of my favorite things about my M1 is the battery life. I wonder how the actual battery life will compare for the different market segments.

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#222

> Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max, the most advanced chips for a PC Nice! When can I order these most advanced PC chips for my next build? Do they have any kind of upgrade path for existing AMD/Intel users? I don't mind starting over too! Exciting times.

I'd be very interested in a standalone ATX board with M3, that's the only way I'm going to buy an Apple desktop.

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In addition to the reduced memory bandwidth, the M3 pro also loses 2 performance cores for only 2 more efficiency cores. M2 pro: 8 performance cores + 4 efficiency cores. M3 pro: 6 performance cores + 6 efficiency cores. Not a great trade... I'm not sure the M3 pro can be considered an upgrade

Depends. Is it faster? Then it's an upgrade. Has the CPU industry really managed to pull off it's attempt at a bs coup that more cores always === better? I thought we'd learned our lesson with the silly Mhz Myth already?

Let me re-write your post with the opposite view. Both are unconvincing.

I thought we'd learned our lesson with the silly cores Myth already? >>

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried to find a laptop with the specification you just mentioned that could last 20 hours on battery. Didn’t.

I'm personally always near a wall socket. My laptop is mostly a desktop. When I'm out and need to use the battery, it's only for a few hours. Do people really need >8h battery life?

Long battery life isn’t strictly necessary no, but it’s nice. A lot nicer than one might expect. It can make the difference between needing to bring a charger or not, plus it’s one less mental background daemon to keep running (thinking about how much life is left, where the nearest outlet is, etc).

Arguably the bigger impact of long battery life is how it’s no longer necessary to throttle the system when it’s unplugged to not burn through battery in an instant. The performance of plugged and unplugged is identical.

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not just that, but if you're not running ARM images then it's running a VM for your docker images to boot. It's just mind-blowing how many containers I have running and my laptop is cool to the touch, and at full battery.

Do note that cool to the touch is a bad thing if the internals are otherwise hot

If the all-aluminum chassis remains cool to the touch despite boiling internals, that's impressive in its own right :-)

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not just that, but if you're not running ARM images then it's running a VM for your docker images to boot. It's just mind-blowing how many containers I have running and my laptop is cool to the touch, and at full battery.

This isn't as much the case anymore. There are typically arm64 images available for the more popular images, and anything you build locally is native, unless you're trying to build x86 software. Redis, Memcached, PostgreSQL, MySQL- it's all native arm64 images now.

> if you're not running ARM images

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But others have caught up You mean others now got to use TSMC's 4nm process? These new M3 chips are probably on the 3nm process, Apple is still a generation ahead here. It looks like Apples aim is to always stay a generation ahead of its competition, I wonder how long they can keep that up since they aren't running their own fabs.

They are literally on the 3nm process. They say so in the video.

Ok, so no probably, they are on 3nm. Anyway my point that they are a generation ahead still stands.

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#229

They kept mentioning performance relative to intel Macs which makes me think there is a large cohort of people sticking to their x86 rigs due to compatibility. Being able to run an x86 linux or windows VM is still a requirement for me.

I'm also still running an i9. I can't justify buying a new one since my 2019 model is still running strong!

Re: Apple unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max

#230

Am I the only one shaking my head that they kept comparing the M3 chips against M1 chips skipping M2? Just like the last product release spent more time on huffing their own farts (the Apple Watch is the first of its kind carbon negative product), there is no real innovation or something to garner interest for me here.

There's a slide comparing them all.

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Scree...

Post reply on HN