I haven't dug too much into the methodology, but it seems like it's done based on privacy policies rather than actually looking into the car telemetry traffic. It's also written in a very caaual and sensationalist "omagad" tone that doesn't serve well the seriousness of the topic or findings
Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
221–230 of 660 posts
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
The touchscreens are really a dealbreaker on new cars. They’re not just prone to quick obsolescence, they’re dangerous.
Is this a US thing? I recently bought a reasonably high end Skoda (which I think would be made in the same factory as VW, SEAT etc). It has a big touch screen in the centre console, but that's really only used for the radio / media / phone calls etc. This is all non essential stuff and so I can deal with it being on a screen. Everything relating to driving is an old skool analogue control. A couple of things I don't…
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#223Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s an eSim. Not a physical SIM card afaik.
Do you have a source for this?
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they put in the touchscreens because it makes internationalization easier. No physical labels and OTA updates. Personally, I don’t think digital internationalization is good for the driver since it appeals to the lowest common denominator of interface while adding another expensive component to replace in case of damage.
I wouldn't even go that far: It's less wires to run. Yea; my cars interface has had 3 radical redesigns since I got it (which I mostly appreciate), but think of how much easier to build a Model 3 is when it foregoes 95% of a cars normal physical buttons for a single screen.
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#226I think it will be a good differentiation factor in a few years, that a brand comes up with an offline car, i.e. a car that you just refuel/charge and drive - no telemetry/connected features involved. It may be a niche thing in future, but certainly something that would be appealing to me as a consumer.
Open source Car!!
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#227The more I read about these things, the more I think I'll be driving my 23 year old Toyota 4Runner until the end of my life
Like in Spain (through rules ultimately coming from Europe) there is a class of vehicles which are gradually being kicked out (banned from crossing certain very ample boundaries around the city): gasoline cars made before 2001, and diesel powered cars made before 2006.
For example, your 23 year old Toyota 4Runner would be deemed too polluting (or noisy, or both) to drive near the city center and auxiliary accesses of Madrid, and starting from 2025 it will be outright banned from driving on any part of the city, with a circle area of ~23 Km (14 miles) diameter from the center.
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#228Of all the horrible things go on with privacy these days, this is the one I hate the most. I’m a “car guy”, but not the sort that obsesses over old cars (although I do love 60s and 80s cars). I like new tech, I like the advances in engineering we’ve made in new vehicles, I like EVs even. Nonetheless I’ve been in the market for a new car for months and haven’t bought because it’s hard to find any cars that meet my req…
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume it's a cost thing. Slapping a tablet everywhere and letting the code monkeys figure it out is probably cheaper than making various knobs and buttons. I dread the day I have to get a new car. Even Subaru, who are usually behind the curve, have gone all touch screen.
The feds have mandated a screen (for backup cameras). Then the makers try to minimize costs by having the screen do everything. I’d like to say I’d pay more for real buttons, but I’d never buy a new car.
Re: Internet-connected cars fail privacy and security tests conducted by Mozilla
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wouldn't even go that far: It's less wires to run. Yea; my cars interface has had 3 radical redesigns since I got it (which I mostly appreciate), but think of how much easier to build a Model 3 is when it foregoes 95% of a cars normal physical buttons for a single screen.
It shouldn't be expensive to make an I2C smart-switch that allows you to place as many buttons as you want on a single set of 3 wires (or 4 if you want a simpler circuit).
Modern cars do it with two wires.