Earlier quoted context omitted.
Horses for courses, as the Brits say. Here we had a government-employed professional who publicly (and mildly) expressed disagreement with another, high-ranking public servant on the merits of an issue of public concern — in a field in which the academic is something of an expert and the other public servant is ... not. That's a whole different kettle of fish than, say, a DMV employee greeting people at the counter w…
But she wasn't speaking as a private citizen. She was delivering a lecture purchased and paid for by the government.
If that's to be the standard, what effect do you think it will have on the hiring desirable faculty by state universities in red states? I'm already seeing reports of trouble in that regard.