Live data from Hacker News

Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

bostonplans.org

221–230 of 413 posts

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#221
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will probably get sniped by someone who actually knows what they're talking about (please correct me if I'm wrong :D), but my impression of the T issues is less a funding issue, and more a competency/corruption issue. We're building above-ground rail at underground rail prices for one example problem.

I toured a piece of property at the border of Charlestown and Somerville near a big T stop. There was an empty lot next to the tracks that was owned by the MBTA on paper. But de facto, the neighbor and was clearly using the entire massive lot as an extended back yard (they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot). Looked up the property records. Either a HIGHLY coincidental name clash, or there…

Perkins St. gang represent!

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#222

There was a cool OddLots episode recently where they talked to a guy who does Office to Residential work and some of the complexity. One thing he talked about, which I didn't know anyone did, was to actually cut through the ceiling/floorplate of buildings to basically "donut" them. This is necessary because many office floorplans are huge with modern HVAC and when converted into residential you end up with either und…

We could also just relax the window requirements for conversions.

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#223

There was a cool OddLots episode recently where they talked to a guy who does Office to Residential work and some of the complexity. One thing he talked about, which I didn't know anyone did, was to actually cut through the ceiling/floorplate of buildings to basically "donut" them. This is necessary because many office floorplans are huge with modern HVAC and when converted into residential you end up with either und…

We could also just relax the window requirements for conversions.

this is how you end up with mass mortality events

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#224
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We could also just relax the window requirements for conversions.

this is how you end up with mass mortality events

Aren't we all subject to death though ?

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#225
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For professions or companies where in-person collaboration is still needed, bigger concentration of business helps focus infrastructure investment into areas where it is most impactful. For instance, it's easier to make a subway line go through an area with lots of offices than it would be to have multiple separate lines passing through satellite hubs.

This stuff is mostly not centrally planned. People are free to open up offices wherever zoning allows (which is generally a lot more places than the few ultra-concentrated areas like downtown Manhattan), yet they tend to concentrate. Perhaps highly concentrating workers and businesses creates the best conditions for free movement of workers between businesses, allowing the best companies to more easily find the best…

It's true that these aren't centrally planned, but good infrastructure provides a feedback loop. People want to work at an office that's easy to commute to, so offices open near good transit. The extra offices require more transit, so more investment goes to the same area. Repeat ad infinitum.

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#226
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will probably get sniped by someone who actually knows what they're talking about (please correct me if I'm wrong :D), but my impression of the T issues is less a funding issue, and more a competency/corruption issue. We're building above-ground rail at underground rail prices for one example problem.

I toured a piece of property at the border of Charlestown and Somerville near a big T stop. There was an empty lot next to the tracks that was owned by the MBTA on paper. But de facto, the neighbor and was clearly using the entire massive lot as an extended back yard (they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot). Looked up the property records. Either a HIGHLY coincidental name clash, or there…

> they even had a garden shed and paved parking on the MBTA owned lot

Sounds like that neighbor has a solid adverse possession argument to make.

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fun fact - The Big Dig can pay for itself if they ever toll on 93 like they do the Mass Pike

The Big Dig does pay for itself. Despite being horrendously overbudget and overdue, it still works, and it's more valuable than what was put into it. It was a poorly managed success.

> It was a poorly managed success.

Task failed successfully

Re: Boston mayor announces residential conversion program for office buildings

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not exactly a thoughtful and interesting commentary, regardless of correctness.

I'll take correctness over thoughtful or interesting. Maybe I don't fit in here.

Unfortunate but true. This is just another echo chamber
Post reply on HN