Live data from Hacker News

Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

threads.net

221–230 of 356 posts

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#221

I signed up. And the first thing I saw was a whole bunch of posts from people I don't follow. They had the opportunity to learn directly from Twitter's mistakes, and they failed right from the start.

A friend of mine signed up for a quick glance to see what their feed would bring up, since there's no way to get just who you follow.

The literal first handful of things she saw were transphobia, racism, misogyny, or conspiracy theories.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#222

I signed up. And the first thing I saw was a whole bunch of posts from people I don't follow. They had the opportunity to learn directly from Twitter's mistakes, and they failed right from the start.

or they took the right lessons on solving cold starts in social networks and your opinion, valid as it may be, doesnt really matter to them.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#223

I signed up. And the first thing I saw was a whole bunch of posts from people I don't follow. They had the opportunity to learn directly from Twitter's mistakes, and they failed right from the start.

Exactly this. I selected a few folks to follow “when they join threads” and then went to the app. My timeline is full of stuff. Who are these people? Why are they in my feed? Don’t love it.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#224
post #214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can't view content there without an account now. Not sure why people aren't making a bigger deal about this. Acres of content were removed from the public web overnight, and people (like journalists) who still treat this like it's some sort of public service seem clueless to this. Rate limiting is minor compared to that.

They already reverted that. https://www.engadget.com/twitter-quietly-backtracks-on-requi...

I still can't view any content without signing in.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#225

I was surprised to see the invitation to follow all my Instagram friends. Now I’m getting follow requests for my friends. I use Instagram to network with friends “outside of work” and largely outside of the political sphere, and scroll through memes and silly content. It’s kind of like “friends + America’s funniest home videos”. Twitter is all about politics, current events, thought influencers, and work networking.…

> Twitter is all about politics, current events, thought influencers, and work networking.

This is a rather narrow view of what the site is used for. It's also about media, art, and live music -- things that overlap heavily with Instagram.

For example, I've found that you unfortunately can't avoid Twitter when keeping up with the underground electronic music scene in the US. Discord and Reddit have made some strides in replacing it, but not much.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#226

Is there an API? Ultimately, I want to follow my friends' threads/tweets whatever and talk in our private Slack. First there was native integration with Slack, then I could jury rig mine, but now they made it hard on Twitter. Does Threads have the ability to do this? I will not puppeteer this. I want to fire and forget, not arms-race someone.

None that I could find just yet. Have been loving the Bluesky API the past few days and had high hopes something would be ready for threads from the start.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#227
post #92

I feel like there’s a chicken and egg problem for Threads: it uses your existing Instagram social graph to populate your Threads account. Of course FB is going to do that otherwise they lose a massive edge against any competitor. But for me at least my Twitter is a very different social space to my Instagram and there’s very little crossover. So Threads looks like it’ll be text posts with your Instagram friends. Whic…

The problem with Twitter competitors was/is the very thing you mention - lack of accounts to follow. Threads solves this I think sufficiently.

What will keep me from using it at least as of today is that I can’t tell it to only show content (plus ads I guess) of accounts that I follow. I never ever ever want to see posts from some influencer or something - if they pay to advertise then fine, but otherwise hell no.

So far Twitter has the staying power for me but I’m excited to see what develops here.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#228
Looks nice! No website means I won't use it though, I need my casual pop-ins from my computer.

Unrelated: Poor bastards: https://threads.com/

Overnight eclipsed. I think they'll rebrand, like Clubhouse rebranded to Shortcut because of the Clubhouse voicechat app rise in popularity.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#229
post #28

Is this working for people in Firefox? I can't get the site to work for me

'Facebook Container' plugin stops it from loading.

Hm, last official release was 8 months ago. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/facebook-cont... The github page looks fairly active, and there is a fix merged already for this https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/pull/936 and once issue #933 gets merged, it will generate a source release for 2.3.11 at https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/releases which will probably become 2.3.12 on AMO after some manual intervention.

Re: Threads has passed 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours

#230
I too name my applications after unrelentingly grim post-apocalyptic British films¹ that harrowingly depict the catastrophic failure of institutions and the dire social and cultural outcomes that accompany the collapse of civilization. This does seem perfectly on-brand for Facebook.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(1984_film)

Post reply on HN