Live data from Hacker News

Goodreads has no incentive to be good

countercraft.substack.com

221–230 of 245 posts

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#221
I have been complaining about this for years and years as someone who builds these types of platforms. It's the same for thousands of niches across google. The top result is camped by some SEO garbage. For instance, I run a kpop platform right now (kpopping.com) my competitors are making 10x what I make just copying my pages and putting them up on a wordpress.

I'm so sick of it. Google can't be destroyed soon enough for me.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#222
post #66
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. But I ask objectively, not in comparison to Atomic Habits. And, perhaps, if there's any book better than the two... feel free to comment.

"Tiny Habits" by Dr. BJ Fogg, a research associate at Stanford, is my preferred book (though my view is more boring: I think "Atomic Habits," "The Power of Habit," and "Tiny Habits" are all worth a glance-through). From my personal experience, I remembered the most from this book years later, in contrast to the other two. Specifically, I still use the idea of "prompts" for behaviour change. I remembered how it's typi…

A second thanks for this, I saved your comment and will give Tiny Habits a shot.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#224
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure if you're serious or sarcastic, but I completely agree. Productivity hacking culture needs to die a painful death. Life is about so much more than just maximizing output...

Life is about identifying your values and finding ways to work towards those values. If he does that with productive evenings instead of watching TV, I am sure that gives him purpose and makes him happy.

I agree, but you must admit hustle culture is a thing, and the OP sure sounds like they've fallen victim to it.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#225
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good point. I was so frustrated at how bad the book Atomic Habits was, (in comparison to Power of Habit). It felt like some 20 year old was explaining how to life a good life with all the experience 20 year olds have. Lots of idealistic ways to organize things. Lots of mental gymnastics to supposedly make you more productive. I did like the 'improve yourself 1% a day', but I did that with a spin bike and quickly got…

>Meanwhile Power of Habit was more like a pop-science book with the goal of teaching you brain science and apply it. I'd pay 50k-100k for that book, it has been revolutionary. I'm off all drugs, I can quit social media whenever I want(I'm only back because of LLMs), I quit video games, I made my evenings productive instead of hedonistic. Is it that good?

No, god no! That book horrible just like the its Atomic cousin. I tried both and these are such sheer waste of time and can be a good tool to humiliate your own intellect.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#226

Alternatives (some from the comments here): https://www.thestorygraph.com/ https://oku.club/ https://www.librarything.com/ https://joinbookwyrm.com/ https://bookrastinating.com/ (I haven't tried any of these yet.)

I have tried all of these - yes, all of these. None of them are as good as GoodReads, not even close. And that is with the understanding that GoodReads itself is really bad.

LibraryThing is like a poor GoodReads, that's it.

So no.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#227
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ChatGPT is the best book recommender I've used. Tell it a few books (even one book works) you like and it will give you solid recommendations.

It is good, but only for books published before the training cutoff date right? That’s sometime in 2021.

Well, I assume it'll get updated at some point and there are more than enough books in the time span until it does.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good point. I was so frustrated at how bad the book Atomic Habits was, (in comparison to Power of Habit). It felt like some 20 year old was explaining how to life a good life with all the experience 20 year olds have. Lots of idealistic ways to organize things. Lots of mental gymnastics to supposedly make you more productive. I did like the 'improve yourself 1% a day', but I did that with a spin bike and quickly got…

> I'm off all drugs, I can quit social media whenever I want(I'm only back because of LLMs), I quit video games, I made my evenings productive instead of hedonistic. Good god, how scary. Thanks for the warning!

I had the same thought but then I do need to make sure my evenings are the right kind of hedonism.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you also track books you want to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsundoku I know exactly what books I want to read.

I am into my first thousand books. If I have a queue of 10-20 already purchased (garage, deals, new, offers) and someone recommends a book somewhere such as HN, I add it. I don't think tracking books you want to read is Tsundoku.

Neither do I.

I have over two shelf feet of books I plan to read and haven’t yet. No that’s a lie, it’s at least four.

Re: Goodreads has no incentive to be good

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you don't just track books you've read, you also track books you want to read, which is much harder to remember. I also tag them to indicate if I already own them and in what format (physical, epub, audio). Saves me from purchasing duplicates when I'm at the used book store.

> you also track books you want to read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsundoku I know exactly what books I want to read.

I never understood that concept. What is wrong with having your own library? I have about 200 books on my shelves I haven't read and any time I want to I can find something interesting. It's s luxury but not anything I'm embarrassed about. Makes more sense than keeping the books I've already read on my bookshelves.
Post reply on HN