221–230 of 252 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm increasingly p1ssed off by the name "OpenAI"...
How dare someone use the holy and sacred "Open" prefix for something that isn't blessed by the OSS mafia.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190224031626/https://blog.open...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And to Google and Amazon and GitHub and Slack and 100 other SaaSs. Not sure why openai is supposed to be more of a concern.
Because whatever you send to ChatGPT may be future training data for their AI model. Mixing up your data with other customer's data is not really part of Slack's business (yet?).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let’s not pretend Google search is what people mean when they say “cloud.” It’s about running internal processes on external systems. As to the risks, many companies live and die by their internal secrets. These range from a private keys, customer lists, trading strategies, and similar trade secrets to actual serious R&D efforts. Sometimes the damage is obvious such as crypto exchanges suddenly finding themselves bro…
Again, how do you know that somebody doesn't put something sensitive into the Google Search bar?
I'm not suggesting the concerns aren't valid, but I guess I don't understand why this same principal isn't applied to other internet connected / cloud software? Do these companies worry that web browsers like Chrome could leak data or applications like Google Docs? What is it about an AI chat bots that makes the risk of a data leak so much higher? Is something about OpenAI's ToS? Or it's relative infancy?
With ChatGPT, you get researchers paid over $1m per year [1] to use you as a training data source and ship stuff with basic bugs and then "feel sorry" when stuff breaks: https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/23/openai_ceo_leak/
Another position for those like Samsung: preventing ChatGPT use encourages incubation of internal competing solutions.
[1] https://davidgoudet.medium.com/how-did-this-ai-scientist-end....
I'm not suggesting the concerns aren't valid, but I guess I don't understand why this same principal isn't applied to other internet connected / cloud software? Do these companies worry that web browsers like Chrome could leak data or applications like Google Docs? What is it about an AI chat bots that makes the risk of a data leak so much higher? Is something about OpenAI's ToS? Or it's relative infancy?
From TechCrunch on March 1, 2023: "Starting today, OpenAI says that it won’t use any data submitted through its API for “service improvements,” including AI model training, unless a customer or organization opts in." So prior to that, they were willing to use your data for model training. Every service may have leaks/security issues, but few say they'll purposely use your data. OpenAI probably should've promised not…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I appreciate your apology as it sort of came across that way. I'll give you a real-life anecdotal example to expand a little on my point. My buddy is a front-end developer for a company which produce pretty basic "stuff" (sorry, I don't know anything about front-end) according to him. He says that he's gotten lazy and unmotivated to do anything about it. This leaves him unchallenged and he doesn't really like his job…
Perhaps the fact that I work exclusively on the front-end is why I also derive tremendous value from GPT-4, and I have been perplexed by others saying they find no value in GPT-4 for coding. There is so much boilerplate BS that GPT-4 just nails down and lets me move on to bigger things. Just yesterday, I needed to mock up a quick prototype for a new feature we're developing. I just paste in my existing React componen…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s because OpenAI can use any data that you send to chatgpt for training purposes. [0] They don’t do it with their APIs btw. “(c) Use of Content to Improve Services. We do not use Content that you provide to or receive from our API (“API Content”) to develop or improve our Services. We may use Content from Services other than our API (“Non-API Content”) to help develop and improve our Services. You can read more…
"We do not use Content that you provide to or receive from our API ("API Content") to develop or improve our Services." That sentence does not claim OpenAI does not use such Content for other purposes besides "developing and improving the Services". For example, using the Content in a manner that potentially harms Samsung's business. What does "develop or improve our Services" even mean? There is no definition. Third…
> Save new chats to your history and allow them to be used to improve ChatGPT via model training
Earlier quoted context omitted.
As somebody who is completely puzzled why you could think that the cloud is a terrible bet for many companies - are these companies allowing their employees to use Google Search or other parts of the internet or do they have to look up things in paper books in the corporate library?
Let’s not pretend Google search is what people mean when they say “cloud.” It’s about running internal processes on external systems. As to the risks, many companies live and die by their internal secrets. These range from a private keys, customer lists, trading strategies, and similar trade secrets to actual serious R&D efforts. Sometimes the damage is obvious such as crypto exchanges suddenly finding themselves bro…
I'm not suggesting the concerns aren't valid, but I guess I don't understand why this same principal isn't applied to other internet connected / cloud software? Do these companies worry that web browsers like Chrome could leak data or applications like Google Docs? What is it about an AI chat bots that makes the risk of a data leak so much higher? Is something about OpenAI's ToS? Or it's relative infancy?
From TechCrunch on March 1, 2023: "Starting today, OpenAI says that it won’t use any data submitted through its API for “service improvements,” including AI model training, unless a customer or organization opts in." So prior to that, they were willing to use your data for model training. Every service may have leaks/security issues, but few say they'll purposely use your data. OpenAI probably should've promised not…
I'm not suggesting the concerns aren't valid, but I guess I don't understand why this same principal isn't applied to other internet connected / cloud software? Do these companies worry that web browsers like Chrome could leak data or applications like Google Docs? What is it about an AI chat bots that makes the risk of a data leak so much higher? Is something about OpenAI's ToS? Or it's relative infancy?
We are not to use any third party cloud hosted software that is not approved to store proprietary information.
There are only three external SaaS companies that I am aware of that we use that stores anything proprietary.
We are not even allowed to take pictures of the whiteboard because the pictures can be synced to external cloud storage providers.