Earlier quoted context omitted.
Programmers' solutions aren't all objective, or at least shouldn't be. Simple tasks are. In some cases people are using overly low-level tooling, creating a lot of repetitive work that the AI would do better, and they might be at risk.
Objectively correct in the sense that we need 2+2 to equal 4 and we don't care how you got there kind of objectively correct. Whereas an artist might need 2+2 to equal apple, and we can only subjectively solve for why or how.
End-user-facing software is apparently close to art. You're trying to solve a human problem and make it pretty. But even deep backend stuff is largely designed and built around how people understand tasks.
I do look forward to ChatGPT telling me why my C++ code won't link, though.