I categorically reject ads. I want them completely abolished. I will do everything that's in my power to get them out of my machines. If I had just a little bit more courage I would go out at night with cans of spray paint and deface billboards.
Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
221–230 of 608 posts
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I really don't understand how most people can stand to browse with all the ads People don't browse, they app.
Even then, most apps are just thinly veiled webapps for which the site (with Firefox and uBlock) provides the same or superior experience, ad-free.
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, the cookie popups are only there because of regulation. You are right about all the rest.
Excuse me? What regulation requires cookie popups?
EU Directive 2009/136/EC
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#224Adguard provides public DNS servers that can be used for blocking ads on your phone as well, no VPN required: https://adguard-dns.io/kb/general/dns-providers/
https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-dns-2-0-goes-open-source...
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#225Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The experience is so awful when I browse on my iPad, instead of my Android phone with Firefox+UBlock. I really don't understand how most people can stand to browse with all the ads. Most people don’t. Most people who use anything for iOS tend to use things like: - 1Blocker - super full featured, including custom script and css rules. business model is paid software, not ‘acceptable ads’ paying them for placement or…
95% of users have no idea what any of this is.
But OP was talking about U-Block Origin so they’re not in that 95%.
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As a result, less and less of the independent web is getting traffic Tracking cookies are not mandatory. You are not obligated to present cookie banner: you can simply drop nonessential cookies.
Getting money for running websites is also non-mandatory? Are we going to fund them from the government 5-year plans yet? Our hosting expenses alone are 8k per month.
Your business problems aren't our concern. If you're financing your business by stealing personal information from users and selling it to data brokers, then you're a crook. Crooks tend to have high hosting expenses.
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
I purposely look away when YouTube starts playing ads. It's silly I know, but I get a tiny amount of satisfaction from not letting them advertise to me.
Can't you still hear them?
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
The experience is so awful when I browse on my iPad, instead of my Android phone with Firefox+UBlock. I really don't understand how most people can stand to browse with all the ads. The modern web is so much worse than the pop up ads of the old web.
> I really don't understand how most people can stand to browse with all the ads In my case, I browse a limited number of web sites that offer no ads (or a minimum amount). The moment I visit a web site with tons of ads, I just close it immediately and just ignore my original intention of visiting that website (e.g., this happens sometimes in HN: people link websites of newspapers, but I don't last in them more than…
Re: Google cracks down on VPN based adblockers
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The experience is so awful when I browse on my iPad, instead of my Android phone with Firefox+UBlock. I really don't understand how most people can stand to browse with all the ads. Most people don’t. Most people who use anything for iOS tend to use things like: - 1Blocker - super full featured, including custom script and css rules. business model is paid software, not ‘acceptable ads’ paying them for placement or…
95% of users have no idea what any of this is.