221–230 of 564 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has details https://twitter.com/theryanking/status/1493390167461224451
Wow. After reading this I clicked on CEO Ryan Breslow's Twitter profile pic which is of him barefoot, wearing a psychedelic hoodie and sitting in a yoga position with his palms upturned. Between this loan idea, the self-reference to the 4 day work week and the yogi pose, it's like something straight out of HBO's "Silicon Valley."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
For a small company, "over hiring" is always a sign of incompetency of the management. Think about the good companies in the early days. They can do so much with so few people, like one person evolving zookeeper into a beast to handle FB's scale, or two people having implemented LevelDB in a matter of months, or one person figuring out a way to increase the density of co-lo rack by 10 times.
> or one person figured out a way to increase the density of co-lo rack by 10 times. Curious, whom are you referring? Sorry for my ignorance.
I think there was some colo in the day that charged only by sqft and gave away the electricity assuming customers would have reasonable densities. Somehow Google crammed a completely unreasonable density of machines into the colo. I would guess this was corkboard days. When the contract was renewed, the colo was sure to change the terms.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's definitely not random, but it's not perfectly ordered according to merit/performance either. Some times entire departments are laid off if their projects are part of the cuts. You can be the best performer and still get laid off if you're in the wrong department. Some times companies will identify key employees and ask them to "re-apply" for other positions at the company in other departments. More often, cuts a…
Are managers and senior middle management more protected from being laid off ?
This kind of message feels more authentic to me if you put the big news in the first sentence, then cover logistics, then add any context you want. Seems better than making people wade through a lot of stuff about securing financial position, market conditions, etc etc to learn if they are losing their job.
Edit: I'm going to leave the below message but wanted to acknowledge that OP meant that the message could be more authentic. I misread. How is this authentic? I was reading through and thinking how it's mincing words and making it sound like everyone is going to feel the same pain. "This is one of the hardest messages I’ve ever had to send." Bad start. Why do CEOs make this about them? "Unfortunately, this includes r…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both "we overhired" and "it's because of the market" can be true at the same time. You get a $335 million in Feb with a common understanding with current investors that you are going to raise $ XXX in roughly 24 month, depending on results compared to an agreed upon business plan. You thus plan for a roughly 24 month runway. 4 month later (now) you get a call from your investors that your planned next series is going…
> They didn't overhire compared to the initial plan... Frankly I don't care what their plan was if they "planned" to spend ~350M in 2 years while making 10-40M in annual revenue while getting sued by their largest customer. That is an absolutely insane level of spending. Just because you had a plan to do some unsustainable and irresponsible crap doesn't absolve you of responsibility when it turns out to be unsustaina…
This kind of message feels more authentic to me if you put the big news in the first sentence, then cover logistics, then add any context you want. Seems better than making people wade through a lot of stuff about securing financial position, market conditions, etc etc to learn if they are losing their job.
I said the same thing earlier this week about Klarna's announcement. For those not in the know, it's called BLUF - https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-to-write-email-with-military-pre... Don't waste people's time by burying the most important information. You can receive a longform explanation, but not at the expense of comprehension or speed of delivery.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both "we overhired" and "it's because of the market" can be true at the same time. You get a $335 million in Feb with a common understanding with current investors that you are going to raise $ XXX in roughly 24 month, depending on results compared to an agreed upon business plan. You thus plan for a roughly 24 month runway. 4 month later (now) you get a call from your investors that your planned next series is going…
> They didn't overhire compared to the initial plan... Frankly I don't care what their plan was if they "planned" to spend ~350M in 2 years while making 10-40M in annual revenue while getting sued by their largest customer. That is an absolutely insane level of spending. Just because you had a plan to do some unsustainable and irresponsible crap doesn't absolve you of responsibility when it turns out to be unsustaina…
No, but I strongly suspect that both YC and Bolt CEO reached the same conclusion: "what was true few month ago isn't anymore, so we need to buckle, focus a bit less on growth-at-all-cost and a bit more on extend-the-runway"
I am one of those let go today. It's especially bad, because they seem to have messed up the invite templates. I received one to the Town Hall meeting, even before Majus letter was published, only to get the invitation cancelled and receive and invitation to "Bolt Restructuring". What an emotional rollercoaster. Extremely anxious about the future, as this is my first time being laid off, especially in the current mar…
"troll account. didn't actually get laid off from bold. curious to see how long it takes HN to realize this."