Live data from Hacker News

MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

apple.com

221–230 of 1001 posts

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#221
post #142

The 16" has a 140w charger, the 14" has a 97w charger. Did the TSA stop limiting chargers to 97-100w? I priced both w/32core 32gb 512ssd and the 16" is only $299 more than the 14" .. I want the 14" though, I'd like that 140w charger.. edit: I confused this with the battery maximums, nevermind! Thanks for letting me know!

TSA regulates the SIZE of the battery, not the charging mechanism.

https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/...

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#223
post #96

This is literally a dream laptop. Improved in every area and lacking in none I can think of right now. And the price is crazy cheap for this performance if you ask me.

I was surprised at the price point as well

Maybe, I am missing something but the price seems high.

Possibly this is reflected in my general consumer use case, but all of my high computation oriented use cases are offloaded to a desktop.

Where are you deriving the majority of the value for this offering?

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#225

I don't really like the chassis design. It looks dated. But the rest of the Macbook Pro sounds really exciting! For those who missed the keynote, here are some laugh-inducing moments - "Our Pro users love to use physical function keys. So we have added them" "Our Pro users like to connect a lot of devices without using a lot of dongles"

I had the same thought. It looks like the 2011-2012 era chasis. Kind of funny but I imagine it’s necessary for the added ports. Probably couldn’t work with the slimmer form factor because of those, and scaling it would make it too big. Guess we can’t have our cake and eat it too.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#226
post #92

Wow looks like Apple has abandoned every bad decision on the MBP for the past 5 years in one swoop. No touchbar, increased key travel, added back hdmi/sd/headphone/power jacks. Plus bumped up RAM limit, M1, new displays, 120Hz... Wow.

And they made a new bad decision: a notch.

This isn't a bad decision. They are literally adding more space on the screen that would normally be useless.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#227
It's great Apple is changing course back to where they were in 2013. What sucks is that all those laptops built between 2013 and 2022 will be dogs on the used market.

For my money, I'm getting the Framework latop and I'm going to bite the bullet and run (in order of preference) FreeBSD, NixOS, or some Linux (Ubuntu, probably). I'm tired of Apple's shit.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#228

How many external monitors does it support? I got an M1 mini only to find out it could only drive 2 4K monitor. And the M1 notebooks can only use 1 external 4K monitor. I'm not getting one of these until I can run 3 external 4K monitors like I'm doing on my 2019 Macbook 16-inch right now.

2 or 4 external 4K monitors, depending on whether you choose Pro or Max.

M1 Pro - 2x 6K monitors plus built-in display

M1 Max - 3x 6K display plus additional 4K display plus built-in display

External displays are 60Hz only.

Re: MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch

#229
post #202

I can live without HDMI, but it never made sense to me to put SD on the chopping block. In what sense was USB-C ever supposed to be an alternative to SD card slots? Edit: For clarity, read my reply to anamexis before responding to this.

Opposite for me - I almost never used the SD slot, so a dongle was no problem for me, but I used HDMI all the time.
Post reply on HN