Live data from Hacker News

Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

oregonlive.com

221–227 of 227 posts

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#221
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I take it you haven’t actually tried to do this? I’ve been involved in several instances of trying to do this now, and it varies from nearly a full time job to 2 full time jobs for anyone who would be otherwise going to a home - and often scary, stressful, and traumatizing to boot.

> I take it you haven’t actually tried to do this? What is “this?” I’m talking about cheap and simple early interventions that delay or even avoid needing to put elders in a home by avoiding the negative effects of badly managed healthcare. Incidentally, this level of care is the vast majority elder care that gets no funding or attention; instead, the focus is put on the hard cases or intervention when it’s too late…

The ‘this’ is taking care of someone who is declining or needs assistance for daily living - added on to the responsibilities of one of their children, which is how I read your comment.

The difficult situations I’m talking about were folks who didn’t need emergency intervention and weren’t hard cases. Rather folks who would wander out side the home looking for yard work to do and then hurt themselves because they thought they were 20, or who would try to go to union hall (that they used to go to), and then get lost on the way.

Those situations were much, much harder to handle than they looked from the outside, and caused immense stress on the caregivers relationship with their spouse (and them), required full time attention (which means no job and fewer social events or other outside activities), and while yes placed less strain on ‘the system’, were an immense strain on the people involved.

They still ended up having to go to care homes, as it eventually (after 5ish years) was too crushing a load.

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#222
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It’s quite disgusting as she is a mother with a disabled child. how is that disgusting? that seems entirely consistent with her beliefs, as disabled child means high costs which potentially could mean getting denied care on the basis of cost. it's not any different than say, "congresswoman with cancer pushes for cancer treatment funding bill".

Dude, seriously just shut up. I am physically and medically disabled and I am of childbearing age. I require an orphan drug (a blood product from paid blood donors which contains the pooled antibodies from tens of thousands of people, as required by FDA regulation) which quite literally costs hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, under contract by insurance, just so I can stay alive, as I have an immune mediated…

If you're not paying for it then someone else is. The question is how many net contributors does it take to pay for you? Hundreds? Thousands?

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then don't fine poor people. Fine private care homes only as was suggested elsewhere in this thread. In the article it explains that they're only considering a fee for facilities, not for individuals.

> Then don't fine poor people Means-testing for public services? Please no. Means testing introduces bureaucratic hurdles, and the cost of determining and enforcing means limits can be up to 10x the actual amounts paid out. https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2013/jan/14/...

I dislike means testing as much as anyone, but a simple test of "are you a private business/facility with more than 1 employee" is one that I could get behind due to its inherently low bureaucratic overhead.

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#224
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I take it you haven’t actually tried to do this? What is “this?” I’m talking about cheap and simple early interventions that delay or even avoid needing to put elders in a home by avoiding the negative effects of badly managed healthcare. Incidentally, this level of care is the vast majority elder care that gets no funding or attention; instead, the focus is put on the hard cases or intervention when it’s too late…

The ‘this’ is taking care of someone who is declining or needs assistance for daily living - added on to the responsibilities of one of their children, which is how I read your comment. The difficult situations I’m talking about were folks who didn’t need emergency intervention and weren’t hard cases. Rather folks who would wander out side the home looking for yard work to do and then hurt themselves because they tho…

> because they thought they were 20

That is a hard case, one that I originally explicitly called out as extremely difficult to handle. So your criticism is unfounded.

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#225
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ‘this’ is taking care of someone who is declining or needs assistance for daily living - added on to the responsibilities of one of their children, which is how I read your comment. The difficult situations I’m talking about were folks who didn’t need emergency intervention and weren’t hard cases. Rather folks who would wander out side the home looking for yard work to do and then hurt themselves because they tho…

> because they thought they were 20 That is a hard case, one that I originally explicitly called out as extremely difficult to handle. So your criticism is unfounded.

Certainly not in the opinion of the Dr's or insurance companies, who didn't think he should be or needed to be in a dedicated nursing home.

So perhaps you're jumping to conclusions?

Near as I could tell, the only difficult cases they felt should be in nursing homes were those that were violent, non-compliant with direction, prone to escape (not in this sense which is a 'hey, I want to do x', but will listen if you catch him), but the type that will actively try to bypass security measures, or unable to care for themselves in major ways (like lock in syndrome, inability to follow directions, inability to recognize basic environmental factors, etc.).

Are there potentially easier cases where they are 100% fully functional, yet in nursing homes? Maybe I guess, but I didn't run across any when I was visiting them later. All had some significant cognitive issues that made them very difficult to care for in some major way. But then, this is in California where it is extremely expensive for nursing home care ($3-5k/mo last I remember).

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#226
post #61
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The firefighters are finding it hard to do their jobs because they're being called to help do chores for senior homes. That is what the whole article is about. It sounds to me like they wouldn't mind helping the elderly if it didn't prevent them from fulfilling their primary job of, you know, fighting fires.

Modern fire prevention techniques and building codes mean that firefighters don't spend much time actually fighting fires. Most of their calls are for vehicles crashes and medical emergencies. (And I don't intend this as a criticism of firefighters, someone has to respond to those incidents.)

Sure, but whatever they're supposed to be doing, it's not chores at an old folks home

Re: Firefighters say they’re swamped by calls for routine care from senior homes

#227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dude, seriously just shut up. I am physically and medically disabled and I am of childbearing age. I require an orphan drug (a blood product from paid blood donors which contains the pooled antibodies from tens of thousands of people, as required by FDA regulation) which quite literally costs hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, under contract by insurance, just so I can stay alive, as I have an immune mediated…

If you're not paying for it then someone else is. The question is how many net contributors does it take to pay for you? Hundreds? Thousands?

Dude I paid for it via my FICA taxes. It’s called being on SSDI (which is an ENTITLEMENT program which allows you to have Medicare). In other words, I paid enough into the system to receive such care. It is an entitlement program, not a welfare program.

However, there are 2 disability programs. The other one is called SSI (a means tested program) which is a form of WELFARE (which I am NOT eligible for). You have to be very indignant to be eligible for Medicaid, which is likewise an insurance program. However it can be quite a shitty insurance plan depending on the state you live in, and it can end up being life or death for many disabled. As I said, this situation depends on which state you live in, which is unacceptable and disgusting and it really shows how much one cares for their fellow Americans.

You are basically an idiot for being unaware of the semantics of these two programs as you can become disabled at any time. I suggest you actually spend some time on SSA.gov to learn more.

Also, how dare you talk shit about the cost of my medication. As I said it’s an entitlement program obtained via working (except in very rare cases like End Stage Renal Disease). It is in no way my fault that the government actuaries did not do their jobs properly so that we were properly taxed for such things in the first place. I don’t get it: the American public, assholes like you, think it’s OK to talk shit about the cost of my precious lifesaving medication. Yet, the American public does not do anything to compel congress to negotiate the prices of such lifesaving medications.

By the way, I fight back against this BS about the cost of medications all the time. It’s called reading patents and going through engineering school. Trust me, I know how much these medications actually cost. So yeah, I talk shit about it all the time to people like healthcare lawyers fighting the system.

But seriously, it’s called America and I have a right to this medication whether you agree with it or not.

Also, Americans lack the reasonable expectation that someone will care for them. So, there’s a baseline anxiety and fear that dominates our politics which can end up being quite sadistic.

This situation in its entirety is quite unique in the developed world, and Americans have not gotten their act together. I mean, I even get much better care for my type 1 diabetes (autoimmune and insulin dependent) in Croatia, which I am a citizen of. Because of being Croatian, the world is really my oyster and it confers me Freedom of Movement rights as I am a European Union citizen due to being Croatian. So I can live in 27 EU countries and more, where I am conferred far more rights, including with respect to healthcare.

Most importantly, I don’t have to put up with bullshit drama from Americans like you who think it’s OK not to care for their fellow citizens.

Post reply on HN