Live data from Hacker News

The True Size of Africa (2015)

kai.sub.blue

221–226 of 226 posts

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If one really cares about accuracy, why not getting a globe.

We all do : Google Earth. Is there still a point to 2D maps?

At least here hiking maps are much better than Google maps. (trails are marked and there are smaller paths visible)

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The modern agriculture just means automating depleting natural aquifers and using up topsoil and abusing chemicals at massive scale. Its the agricultural equivalent of optimizing for next quarter, but losing out on next decade.

Ancient equivalent is slash-and-burn agriculture, and famines from crop diseases and droughts. I dont think modern vs oldschool juxtaposition is helpfull

Agreed, but the scale makes all the difference. What few million farmers were doing manually is now being done by same number of of people (approximating, but could be wrong) using massive industrial scale machinery.

Quick google-fu is failing me with actual numbers, but I would not be surprised if we are using 3/4/5 orders of magnitude of water every year compared to 3000 years ago.

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#223
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You get an imbalance with free incoming trade but taxed/impaired outgoing trade. Perhaps a massively importing country can live with it if importers get better deals as a consequence. But otherwise bilateral arguments would be the long term viable approach.

What imbalance? The benefits of free imports accrue whether you’re a big country or a small one. Hong Kong did very well out of unilateral free trade.

The demerits also accrue, you lose a bargaining chip for your export fees, and it makes it more attractive to rely on imported goods than build a local alternative that could lead to an export business.

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Is there still a point to 2D maps? Hiking away from cell towers and wifi Historical maps Maps that aren't owned by Google

> Hiking away from cell towers and wifi Just download the map in advance. > Historical maps Agreed on this. > Maps that aren't owned by Google I agree with this in principle, but there are alternatives to Google Maps and some of them are even gaining popularity because developers in general are terrified of ever relying on Google for anything besides ads.

I actually just came home from a hiking trip hours ago. I was supposed to meet up with a friend along the way. I had a proper map. He only had a phone. Some rainfall and a little bit of bad luck and he could no longer use his phone. Luckily, everything worked out in the end, after some unneeded trouble. But I wouldn't rely on a phone like that.

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#225
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What imbalance? The benefits of free imports accrue whether you’re a big country or a small one. Hong Kong did very well out of unilateral free trade.

The demerits also accrue, you lose a bargaining chip for your export fees, and it makes it more attractive to rely on imported goods than build a local alternative that could lead to an export business.

Huh? You can't just keep importing, because your trading partners want to be paid.

In the long run, imports and exports have to be balanced.

(Some countries export capital goods, like the US: when Chinese investors buy American startups or real estate that doesn't show up on your usual export statistics, but essentially it's still an American export.)

So if you are importing, you can't help but develop exporting industries.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by bargaining chip? What's there to bargain? You just declare unilateral free trade, and let other people decide on their own policy.

Re: The True Size of Africa (2015)

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Just download the map in advance Okay, hiking away from cell towers and wifi and power supplies

My phone gets about 4 days of use currently before recharging, and I could pretty easily find ways to recharge it even using solar power if I wanted to. If you don't want to use your phone as a map that's fine, but it's incredibly convenient for (I'd wager) 99% of use cases.

What about redundancy. You drop your phone and you are lost in the wilderness. You drop the map, you pick it up again.
Post reply on HN