Live data from Hacker News

FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

twitter.com

221–230 of 272 posts

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#221
post #32

I'm not sure I understand the concept of paid access to scientific research, so I'd be grateful if someone with more knowledge of the topic could explain it to me. Governments fund universities, people donate large amounts of money to universities, and a large portion of the population has student debt because of how expensive tuition is. Why are they charging for access to research at these institutions then?

Journals have network effects and prestige. Its moat is a purely social one.

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#222
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realize also that communication you have with others, for example via iMessage, may be stored at Apple if they have iCloud backup enabled.

Only if you have it enabled. But it wouldn't matter anyway, that other party in the communication could easily be somewhere with phone service but no data. Or someone in the group sms could be on a non apple device. Boom, Just like that, your communications have been sent to multiple carriers, including your own. Those carriers all pinky swear that they won't do anything bad with your sms though. So I suppose it's no…

> Only if you have it enabled.

No. If the other person has it enabled then your messages with them are stored by and readable by Apple no matter what your settings are.

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#223

What I find the most fascinating is that a single person, possibly with the help of a few select others, is able to curate, index, host, and serve 85% of scholarly literature[0] which otherwise would be inaccessible to many. 80 million papers are available on Sci-Hub to its half a million daily users.[1] That is around 80 TB of data, and 2 TB of daily outbound traffic.[2] Given the fact that Sci-Hub has achieved all…

I have a NAS which I could probably open up and seed a lot of Scihub content from. But what are the odds that something bad would happen to me, and how bad? Like, a fine? or a raid and jail time?

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#224
post #223

What I find the most fascinating is that a single person, possibly with the help of a few select others, is able to curate, index, host, and serve 85% of scholarly literature[0] which otherwise would be inaccessible to many. 80 million papers are available on Sci-Hub to its half a million daily users.[1] That is around 80 TB of data, and 2 TB of daily outbound traffic.[2] Given the fact that Sci-Hub has achieved all…

I have a NAS which I could probably open up and seed a lot of Scihub content from. But what are the odds that something bad would happen to me, and how bad? Like, a fine? or a raid and jail time?

Or a massive cable bill :)

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#225
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Realize also that communication you have with others, for example via iMessage, may be stored at Apple if they have iCloud backup enabled.

Only if you have it enabled. But it wouldn't matter anyway, that other party in the communication could easily be somewhere with phone service but no data. Or someone in the group sms could be on a non apple device. Boom, Just like that, your communications have been sent to multiple carriers, including your own. Those carriers all pinky swear that they won't do anything bad with your sms though. So I suppose it's no…

> Only if you have it enabled.

This is untrue. I just restored an iCloud backup from my girlfriends account to an old iPhone. Our messages are included.

On my personal iCloud I have iMessage sync disabled and iCloud backups disabled. She has both enabled.

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#226
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and prohibiting search engines and domain name registries from "facilitating access" to Sci-Hub. I just searched for "sci-hub" on DDG, Google and Bing, and the sci-hub.st or sci-hub.se domain was the top result on each. I wonder what happened to the prohibition.

Here in the UK the main sci-hub domains are blocked at the ISP level. We're a very censorous country.

Not by all ISPs, eg my ISP is Andrews and Arnold that does not censor the internet.

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#227
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know Russia has no extradition treaty with the US, but do they never extradite for any reason? Hmm, from what I'm reading on Quora "The Russian Constitution protects its own citizens from extradition to a foreign country." Interesting, I didn't know that.

Sounds offensive that one's compatriots could be given to another country to be put on trial.

You mean like not extraditing that diplomats wife who killed someone in traffic (DUI) and then ran home to the US?

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#228
post #159

Finally, news about a hacker on Hacker News! If you are a hacker, you: - Mistrust authority - Promote decentralization - Share knowledge - Write open-source software - Maintain the infrastructure - Serve humanity - Are curious http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html

That "hacker HOWTO" is horrible, and infused with ESR's ridiculous political ideas. I can think for myself; I don't need and certainly don't want a document which tells me what I should be like, especially not one written by some guy who is advocating for the literal execution of politicians by armed citizens.

But are you a hacker or just trying to stir up the pot?

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#229

What I find the most fascinating is that a single person, possibly with the help of a few select others, is able to curate, index, host, and serve 85% of scholarly literature[0] which otherwise would be inaccessible to many. 80 million papers are available on Sci-Hub to its half a million daily users.[1] That is around 80 TB of data, and 2 TB of daily outbound traffic.[2] Given the fact that Sci-Hub has achieved all…

I'd love to help spread knowledge, but frankly I'm not knowledgeable enough about the risks of seeding to be comfortable with it.

Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder

#230
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats why they said that and not “What is on your iCloud, stays on your iCloud”

A lot of people have porn on their phone, and none would be able to prove its provenance. I wonder if one day Apple will be required to detect all underage model photos and delete the person’s entire Apple account.

I think it more likely Apple would ban porn "to protect the user" if anti-porn became more normal.
Post reply on HN