Live data from Hacker News

Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

teddit.net

221–230 of 312 posts

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sibling comments mentioned some approaches already but just FYI, Hacker News is built on Arc, a custom-made Lisp dialect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arc_(programming_language)

I thought Arc was only for backend? Or does it render HTML as well?

I think the backend directly emits HTML. Some JS (without libraries if I'm not mistaken) is used on the client side for things like voting. I don't know how it does persistence or what its infrastructure looks like.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#222
post #79

If you're looking for a low-cruft, minimalist alternative to Reddit or Twitter that's focused on live conversation, check out https://sqwok.im Disclaimer I am building it. Key Points: - Minimalist design with focus on readability & usability. - Real-time messaging meets news aggregator - All posts have a built-in chat room including presence, typing activity, etc. - Fast, open, simple - Anyone can view posts simply b…

I like it. Thanks, and I hope that it goes well.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#223
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not app's cache I believe, but rather app's data. I think they're different? It's indeed 39MB on Play Store, but after I installed it and used it for a month, it's using 1GB+ storage on my phone (after I deleted app's cache).

Ha, I hate it when apps do that. One of the main reason I got rid of Spotify and my Spotify paid subscription was because their android app gobbled all the free space it could find on a device by filling it with caches music. “Of course Spotify, I pay extra for more storage on me device so you can use it to cache songs and save a few cents on bandwidth, you’re very welcome.”

Funny, that's pretty much the only reason I pay for spotify. Having music offline is really handy when you're out and not near wi-fi.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The irony of complaining about one echo chamber and enjoying living in the 'no javascript' bubble is astounding. Can you use text-only websites for most use cases? Sure. Are people more likely to pay for your product if your website has client-sided interactivity and doesn't look awful? Absolutely. I really don't get this complain and I've only seen it from developers. Certainly not company owners for pay for server/…

Are you sure it's not just that developers understand how the web works and know there's an alternative? Most normies have no clue what JavaScript is

[dead]

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#226
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another way is to use the checkbox-and-CSS trick. You add a hidden checkbox next to the element you want to hide, add a label to trigger the checkbox, and then use a + selector to toggle the visibility based on the state of the checkbox. Like this: Toggle spoiler Spoilery stuff goes here #spoiler, #spoilerContent{display: none;} #spoiler:checked+#spoilerContent{display: block;} You can also use a variation of this fo…

Yes. But I believe details / summary is considered more accessible. Since its in the spec it's something AT has or is working towards.

It be more correct to say what grishka said above: "that will mess up screenreaders though"

But if it's more accessible depends on the target user. If you're target are IE users or users with very old browser versions, for one reason or another, more accessible would be to use the CSS toggle trick. But if indeed your target user are users using screenreaders and using recent browsers, then details and summary elements would be more accessible.

A bit anal, but important to consider when talking about accessibility, it's very context sensitive.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#227

Privacy focused? This unknown site is proxy-Ing all requests too/from Reddit. Who knows what (if anything ) they are doing with that information. Surprised not to see this comment 12 hours and 200 comments layer.

It's a valid concern, but the app is open-source, so you can download it and run it yourself locally if you want.

Looking at the README I bet it would take about 5 minutes to create Dockerfile for this.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It feels to me like Reddit is only good for hobby or niche interests you might have. The main subreddits and politics are what make Reddit the shittiest. But if you stay away from these it’s ok.

It is still quite common on Reddit for users to inject politics into absolutely everything, regardless of the subject. It really is difficult to get away from sometimes.

It's more about the people than the media though. All media can be invaded by politics because of people.

Re: Teddit: a free and open-source Reddit front end focused on privacy

#230
post #227

Privacy focused? This unknown site is proxy-Ing all requests too/from Reddit. Who knows what (if anything ) they are doing with that information. Surprised not to see this comment 12 hours and 200 comments layer.

It's a valid concern, but the app is open-source, so you can download it and run it yourself locally if you want. Looking at the README I bet it would take about 5 minutes to create Dockerfile for this.

The “privacy “ comes from proxying the connection to Reddit. If you run it locally every post viewed will be seen by them.
Post reply on HN