Live data from Hacker News

Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

funkwhale.audio

221–230 of 306 posts

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#221
post #19

I've been using this for a little over a year and like it a lot but it lacks the music discovery features of commercial platforms (which becomes important when you have terabytes of music) and takes a lot of effort to organize music and create play lists. The music onboarding process typically starts with organizing metadata with Musicbrainz Picard then import the collection into Funkwhale's DB via a cli admin tool.…

Which music service's discovery features actually work? For me the only one that worked was Google Play Music. The rest have been total and utter crap at discovery.

I would pay the monthly spotify fee for their "discover weekly" playlist alone.

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#222
post #6

Honest question, how is this legal? It looks as if there is the ability to share your music online. Can someone explain the difference between this and say Napster, Limewire, Kaza, etc? Rather than storing it locally, it’s just online... or am I missing something here?

From my understanding it's legal for the same reason Apache, nginx, curl, etc. are legal. The software can be used to violate copyright, but that doesn't make the software itself illegal.

Tell that to youtubedl. Embrace for stricter control from copyright groups because they don't like the tools either.

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure. Your remarks only prove my point. But I am a realist. And I wouldn't keep focusing on music. It's an easy target. Audio happens to be my thing but I'm concerned at the cavalier attitude and on a broader level. Let's for one minute, expand the remit. It's not funkwhale, it's carwhale, foodwhale, healthwhale. Keep going. Keep thinking. If all we're doing is not creating anew, but instead forging special keys that…

> it's carwhale, foodwhale, healthwhale. Keep going. Keep thinking. You're describing a post-scarcity utopia where we can spend our creative energy where we want and not be tied down to jobs that we hate in order to pay the bills. Yes, I would very much like that for everyone. Thank you for bringing this topic up. Let it come.

Haha. I've read that. Remind me, in this Utopia, who collects the trash?

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Idols? Famous guitarists that have bubbled under your nose? What about new guitarists?

Well if I am not listening to them why would they complain about me pirating their music?

Is it because you're not interested in a cohesive society?

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#226
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Grooveshark was awesome! From the brand, the UI, the service. RIP Grooveshark.

They really were the best, and they had obscure music that I would have never expected they'd have. Old SNES game OST like the super mario rpg soundtrack was there. It felt like if I could think it, I could find it. Ad-free and flawless free experience. Truly a gem.

If you're looking for that specifically and weren't aware of it already, there's a ton of old videogame OSTs archived on KHinsider.

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#227
I see it supports Raspberry Pi installation. Can anyone speak off-hand to what the performance is like on a Pi, or what generation minimum is recommended? I'm assuming my original Pi Model B might be a little long in the tooth, and my Pi Zero might be under-speced.

But I could see myself setting this up on a newer Pi and plugging in my 1.5TB external into it to share out all my music with my family. Right now I've got a Samba share on my Windows HTPC for my internal network, but something the rest of the family can use would be sweet.

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#228
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

groove shark, now theres a name I have not heard for a long time...

Grooveshark was awesome! From the brand, the UI, the service. RIP Grooveshark.

Check this out, if you want to know a little about the internal history of Grooveshark: https://sharklore.org/

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#229
post #207
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The field of software development embraces technical change, and is made better by also accepting social change. Really? All social change is good for the field of software development? Utter nonsense. This product itself is, if anything, a rejection of the social change towards centralized ad-supported streaming services. > We understand that working in our field is a privilege, not a right. I don't have a right t…

You don’t have a “right” to work in any particular field. Harvey Weinstein has no right to work in the movie industry because of his actions. For that matter, coal miners have no right to continue being coal miners - those jobs are outmoded. You have a right to earn a living, but not to any particular job.

In the absence of a licensing authority for software developers, we have the freedom to work for anyone who will hire us, or for ourselves. No one has the right to work for a particular employer, but also no one can kick a person out of our industry altogether.

Re: Funkwhale – Decentralized, self-hosted music server

#230
post #4
post #2

How do musicians get paid on this platform?

I’m guessing when people purchase the music as it’s not a streaming service. With that said, it appears there is the ability to share music socially - which seems like p2p sharing.

> With that said, it appears there is the ability to share music socially - which seems like p2p sharing.

Which is fine as there is plenty of music that is allowed to be shared free.

Post reply on HN