Earlier quoted context omitted.
As we all know, this isn't the first time Microsoft has copied someone else. And I'm sure it won't be the last. I think Google has a right to complain. Microsoft has resorted to these less than innovative tactics to monopolize themselves for a long time now, and it isn't fair to companies like Google who have worked their butts off (and gave 1.8 million shares - $336M in 2005 - to Stanford for the PageRank algorithm)…
Err, by that line of thinking, Google leveraged Linux (the hard work of volunteers) to earn tens of billions and does not release the modified code for use of the volunteers. Of course they are not required to, but it isn't fair to Linux developers who have worked their butts off to develop Linux.
Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
221–230 of 288 posts
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#222Hmmm. Let's say that Bing sets up a script that sends queries to Google and then records the results. That's clearly copying. But what Bing does is when you use its toolbar, it watches what you do and uses that information to rank results. Is that really copying? It showed Google's Honeypot page because Google's engineers were clicking on the Honeypot page with the toolbar installed. That isn't copying Google's resul…
You take a donkey an some carrots, then you show the donkey than walking by this route he can eat a lot of carrots.
The donkey learn the route and then you complain about the donkey is eating the carrots you put there.Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#223Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's embarrassing for Google to complain about this. You FINALLY get a little competition on your turf and you try to make some big issue that, as a market leader, the product you produce is being watched, analyzed and in some ways incorporated by your competitor. There is no victim here. They are not taking your 1st result and copying it. They are taking the result the user clicked. Obviously you didn't predict that…
I don't think it's embarrassing to point out that Microsoft is playing dirty. They played dirty with Netscape/IE in the 90s and look what happened.
It is kind of embarrassing for Google, but if it is real and it continues, it's better to address it now rather than after MS becomes a titan of search and Google's market has eroded. At times, it seems like MS has changed in ways, but fundamentally they're still run by the same guys. Remember that when you play your Xbox or use Bing or any MS products, they don't like to see other successful software companies.
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bing copying Google's search results is just evil. Not like copying Apple's iPhone design and user interface and giving it away to Apple's competitors, which is good. Right? It's ugly and immoral and probably legal. Good job catching Microsoft at it (and I think the really really unethical and scary bit is that Microsoft is cheerfully stealing info from users via their browser). I also realize that Google got where i…
I don't think Android devices being similar in some ways to the iPhone is even remotely analogous to what Bing is doing here. One is called healthy competition (and I don't see how Android is copying iOS). The other is literally just copying data.
Then iPhone came out and it looked like this: http://km.support.apple.com/library/APPLE/APPLECARE_ALLGEOS/...
Now Android phones look like this: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2795/4208849005_dd4b608729.jp...
You don't see any signs of copying here?
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah. They were loading the same results as Google and Bing when I posted that. They aren't now.
There were a number of bugs around the first result that this whole thing uncovered, so it could have been intermittent. Our backfill in the case of no results can vary. It shouldn't have been showing anything ever beyond the first result though.
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#227Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well yes there is a hard link happening between a google search result and a link being clicked, however googles argument isn't as strong if it turns out bing is doing this for all search engines. It might be that they aren't targeting google specifically, but instead they're targeting all search sites generically.
But then still, the Bing toolbar is watching what you're searching for and recording that information. That's a pretty big privacy issue
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well yes there is a hard link happening between a google search result and a link being clicked, however googles argument isn't as strong if it turns out bing is doing this for all search engines. It might be that they aren't targeting google specifically, but instead they're targeting all search sites generically.
But then still, the Bing toolbar is watching what you're searching for and recording that information. That's a pretty big privacy issue
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well yes there is a hard link happening between a google search result and a link being clicked, however googles argument isn't as strong if it turns out bing is doing this for all search engines. It might be that they aren't targeting google specifically, but instead they're targeting all search sites generically.
But then still, the Bing toolbar is watching what you're searching for and recording that information. That's a pretty big privacy issue
Re: Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or you just "quote" your original misspelled query and Google will search for the misspelled version without any additional click.
Quotes provide you with exact match results. Putting quotes around an entire phrase isn't what I intend sometimes, and quoting each term in the query is just excessive. In that case, I'll just click the extra link...